156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2781053)
1. [The factor of magnification in mammography].
Maggi S; Giuseppetti GM; Spiga G; Macchini M; Procaccini G; Gregori S; Amici F
Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):101-6. PubMed ID: 2781053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus X-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure.
Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann K; Oestmann J; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 9510570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies.
Sickles EA; Doi K; Genant HK
Radiology; 1977 Oct; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 897191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Direct radiographic magnification mammography with a new microfocus tube. Experimental studies of resolution and radiation exposure].
Post K; Hermann KP; Funke M; Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):604-9. PubMed ID: 9411476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Magnification mammography using 0.1 mm microfocus. Comparison of grid and spot-view magnification].
Teubner J; Lenk JZ; Wentz KU; Georgi M
Radiologe; 1987 Apr; 27(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 3037589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J
Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Film-screen combinations in mammography].
Friedrich M
Z Lymphol; 1983 Dec; 7(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 6673399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnification mammography: a low-dose technique.
Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjarngard BE
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 441382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The diagnostic contribution of direct radiographic enlargement and of echography in the study of breast neoplasms].
Cressa C; Gozzi G; Tonutti M; Macorig D; Tessa I
Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 8190922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Value of direct radiographic enlargement (DIMA) in early detection of rheumatic inflammatory lesions. Comparative evaluation with high resolution conventional imaging technique].
Link TM; Fiebich M; Gaubitz M; Krause F; Vestring T; Schneider M; Peters PE
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):405-10. PubMed ID: 7938489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical experiences with direct magnification mammography with the DIMA Plus M11].
von Fournier D; Darai S; Ditzen H; Harcos A; Broitmann L; Anton HW; Bürkelbach J; Zaers J; van Woudenberg S; von Brenndorf AI
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10091304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Controlled single-blind clinical evaluation of low-dose mammographic screen--film systems.
Sickles EA; Genant HK
Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 760148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between the electronic magnification (EM) and true magnification (TM) of breast phantom images using a CDMAM phantom.
Vahey K; Ryan E; McLean D; Poulos A; Rickard M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1514-9. PubMed ID: 21481555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison between direct radiographic enlargement and mammography technique in detection of osseous changes of the hand skeleton in hyperparathyroidism].
Müller-Miny H; Link T; Braun-Anhalt I; Dietl KH; Peters PE
Radiologe; 1996 Oct; 36(10):834-9. PubMed ID: 9036421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
