These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2781066)

  • 1. [Radiologic changes of anatomic parameters of the proximal femur as a function of its position in rotation].
    Rubin PJ; Leyvraz PF; Heegaard JH
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1989; 75(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 2781066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal.
    Eckrich SG; Noble PC; Tullos HS
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Aug; 9(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 7964774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Roentgenographic changes in proximal femoral dimensions due to hip rotation.
    Bell AL; Brand RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Mar; (240):194-9. PubMed ID: 2917433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apparent changes in the alignment of the femoral component in hip arthroplasties associated with limb positioning.
    Goodman S; Rubenstein J; Schatzker J; Kadish L; Fornasier V
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Aug; (221):242-5. PubMed ID: 3608305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized morphometric analysis of the femoral diaphyseal canal.
    Toni A; Fabbri F; Scimeca GB; Zanotti Russo MC; Baruffaldi F; Cianci R; Giunti A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1995; 80(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 7587522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The anatomic basis of femoral component design.
    Noble PC; Alexander JW; Lindahl LJ; Yew DT; Granberry WM; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):148-65. PubMed ID: 3416522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiological aspects in preoperative planning and postoperative assessment of cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Linclau L; Dokter G; Peene P
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 8372651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the morphology of the proximal femur of the Indian population towards designing more suitable THR implants.
    Maji PK; Roychowdhury A; Datta D
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012; 22(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 23016789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predisposing factors in fixation failure of femoral prostheses following primary Charnley low friction arthroplasty. A 10- to 20-year followup study.
    Kobayashi S; Eftekhar NS; Terayama K
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Sep; (306):73-83. PubMed ID: 8070214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fixation of the modular total hip femoral component in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Whiteside LA; Arima J; White SE; Branam L; McCarthy DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):184-90. PubMed ID: 8118973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cementless hip prosthesis design: a basic study and analysis of the proximal femur in normal Japanese people].
    Fuku H
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 68(9):763-73. PubMed ID: 7963930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Geometric analysis of the proximal femur in a diverse sample of dogs.
    Palierne S; Asimus E; Mathon D; Meynaud-Collard P; Autefage A
    Res Vet Sci; 2006 Jun; 80(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 16169026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiologic measurement of lesser trochanter and its clinical significance in Chinese.
    Zhang Q; Liu H; Chen W; Li X; Song Z; Pan J; Zhang Y
    Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19277649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Measurement and classification of geometric parameters in Chinese proximal femur].
    Xue W; Dai K; Tang T; Long G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 19(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 11951531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical usefulness of a computerized tomography study of morphology of the femoral canal in patients candidates for hip prosthesis].
    Nardis P; Bellelli A; Giannecchini S; Ghera S; Santori FS
    Radiol Med; 1995 Oct; 90(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 8552812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. Pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty.
    Jiang CC; Insall JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):50-6. PubMed ID: 2805495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of rotation on radiographic dimensions of the humerus and femur.
    Horsman A; Leung WK; Bentley HB; McLachlan MS
    Br J Radiol; 1977 Jan; 50(589):23-8. PubMed ID: 831915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femoral rotation unpredictably affects radiographic anatomical lateral distal femoral angle measurements.
    Miles JE
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2016; 29(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 26787368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo measurements of relative motion between an uncemented femoral total hip component and the femur by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.
    Nistor L; Blaha JD; Kjellström U; Selvik G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Aug; (269):220-7. PubMed ID: 1864042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.