These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27810865)

  • 1. Graphics and Statistics for Cardiology: Data visualisation for meta-analysis.
    Kiran A; Crespillo AP; Rahimi K
    Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 27810865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More than numbers: the power of graphs in meta-analysis.
    Bax L; Ikeda N; Fukui N; Yaju Y; Tsuruta H; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 169(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 19064649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis.
    Kossmeier M; Tran US; Voracek M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 32028897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Graphical augmentations to the funnel plot assess the impact of additional evidence on a meta-analysis.
    Langan D; Higgins JP; Gregory W; Sutton AJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 22342263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Presenting simulation results in a nested loop plot.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():129. PubMed ID: 25495636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finding your way out of the forest without a trail of bread crumbs: development and evaluation of two novel displays of forest plots.
    Schild AH; Voracek M
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26035471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practice.
    Anzures-Cabrera J; Higgins JP
    Res Synth Methods; 2010 Jan; 1(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 26056093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel presentational approaches were developed for reporting network meta-analysis.
    Tan SH; Cooper NJ; Bujkiewicz S; Welton NJ; Caldwell DM; Sutton AJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):672-80. PubMed ID: 24560089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.
    Debray TPA; Moons KGM; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28975717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
    Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.
    Tang JL; Liu JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.
    Simmonds M
    Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot: As Simple as It Gets.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 81(5):. PubMed ID: 33027562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The number needed to treat in pairwise and network meta-analysis and its graphical representation.
    Veroniki AA; Bender R; Glasziou P; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():11-22. PubMed ID: 30905696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Less is less: a systematic review of graph use in meta-analyses.
    Schild AH; Voracek M
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 26053841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Barendregt JJ; Doi SAR
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Dec; 16(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 29621038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.