These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27811861)

  • 1. A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories.
    O'Daniel JM; McLaughlin HM; Amendola LM; Bale SJ; Berg JS; Bick D; Bowling KM; Chao EC; Chung WK; Conlin LK; Cooper GM; Das S; Deignan JL; Dorschner MO; Evans JP; Ghazani AA; Goddard KA; Gornick M; Farwell Hagman KD; Hambuch T; Hegde M; Hindorff LA; Holm IA; Jarvik GP; Knight Johnson A; Mighion L; Morra M; Plon SE; Punj S; Richards CS; Santani A; Shirts BH; Spinner NB; Tang S; Weck KE; Wolf SM; Yang Y; Rehm HL
    Genet Med; 2017 May; 19(5):575-582. PubMed ID: 27811861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories.
    Ackerman SL; Koenig BA
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29131714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting practices for variants of uncertain significance from next generation sequencing technologies.
    Vears DF; Sénécal K; Borry P
    Eur J Med Genet; 2017 Oct; 60(10):553-558. PubMed ID: 28774848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Points to consider for laboratories reporting results from diagnostic genomic sequencing.
    Vears DF; Sénécal K; Clarke AJ; Jackson L; Laberge AM; Lovrecic L; Piton A; Van Gassen KLI; Yntema HG; Knoppers BM; Borry P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 Jan; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 29184171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
    Amendola LM; Jarvik GP; Leo MC; McLaughlin HM; Akkari Y; Amaral MD; Berg JS; Biswas S; Bowling KM; Conlin LK; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Dulik MC; Ghazani AA; Ghosh R; Green RC; Hart R; Horton C; Johnston JJ; Lebo MS; Milosavljevic A; Ou J; Pak CM; Patel RY; Punj S; Richards CS; Salama J; Strande NT; Yang Y; Plon SE; Biesecker LG; Rehm HL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 27181684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing.
    Rehm HL; Bale SJ; Bayrak-Toydemir P; Berg JS; Brown KK; Deignan JL; Friez MJ; Funke BH; Hegde MR; Lyon E;
    Genet Med; 2013 Sep; 15(9):733-47. PubMed ID: 23887774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge.
    Brownstein CA; Beggs AH; Homer N; Merriman B; Yu TW; Flannery KC; DeChene ET; Towne MC; Savage SK; Price EN; Holm IA; Luquette LJ; Lyon E; Majzoub J; Neupert P; McCallie D; Szolovits P; Willard HF; Mendelsohn NJ; Temme R; Finkel RS; Yum SW; Medne L; Sunyaev SR; Adzhubey I; Cassa CA; de Bakker PI; Duzkale H; Dworzyński P; Fairbrother W; Francioli L; Funke BH; Giovanni MA; Handsaker RE; Lage K; Lebo MS; Lek M; Leshchiner I; MacArthur DG; McLaughlin HM; Murray MF; Pers TH; Polak PP; Raychaudhuri S; Rehm HL; Soemedi R; Stitziel NO; Vestecka S; Supper J; Gugenmus C; Klocke B; Hahn A; Schubach M; Menzel M; Biskup S; Freisinger P; Deng M; Braun M; Perner S; Smith RJ; Andorf JL; Huang J; Ryckman K; Sheffield VC; Stone EM; Bair T; Black-Ziegelbein EA; Braun TA; Darbro B; DeLuca AP; Kolbe DL; Scheetz TE; Shearer AE; Sompallae R; Wang K; Bassuk AG; Edens E; Mathews K; Moore SA; Shchelochkov OA; Trapane P; Bossler A; Campbell CA; Heusel JW; Kwitek A; Maga T; Panzer K; Wassink T; Van Daele D; Azaiez H; Booth K; Meyer N; Segal MM; Williams MS; Tromp G; White P; Corsmeier D; Fitzgerald-Butt S; Herman G; Lamb-Thrush D; McBride KL; Newsom D; Pierson CR; Rakowsky AT; Maver A; Lovrečić L; Palandačić A; Peterlin B; Torkamani A; Wedell A; Huss M; Alexeyenko A; Lindvall JM; Magnusson M; Nilsson D; Stranneheim H; Taylan F; Gilissen C; Hoischen A; van Bon B; Yntema H; Nelen M; Zhang W; Sager J; Zhang L; Blair K; Kural D; Cariaso M; Lennon GG; Javed A; Agrawal S; Ng PC; Sandhu KS; Krishna S; Veeramachaneni V; Isakov O; Halperin E; Friedman E; Shomron N; Glusman G; Roach JC; Caballero J; Cox HC; Mauldin D; Ament SA; Rowen L; Richards DR; San Lucas FA; Gonzalez-Garay ML; Caskey CT; Bai Y; Huang Y; Fang F; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Barrera J; Garcia-Lobo JM; González-Lamuño D; Llorca J; Rodriguez MC; Varela I; Reese MG; De La Vega FM; Kiruluta E; Cargill M; Hart RK; Sorenson JM; Lyon GJ; Stevenson DA; Bray BE; Moore BM; Eilbeck K; Yandell M; Zhao H; Hou L; Chen X; Yan X; Chen M; Li C; Yang C; Gunel M; Li P; Kong Y; Alexander AC; Albertyn ZI; Boycott KM; Bulman DE; Gordon PM; Innes AM; Knoppers BM; Majewski J; Marshall CR; Parboosingh JS; Sawyer SL; Samuels ME; Schwartzentruber J; Kohane IS; Margulies DM
    Genome Biol; 2014 Mar; 15(3):R53. PubMed ID: 24667040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical laboratories collaborate to resolve differences in variant interpretations submitted to ClinVar.
    Harrison SM; Dolinsky JS; Knight Johnson AE; Pesaran T; Azzariti DR; Bale S; Chao EC; Das S; Vincent L; Rehm HL
    Genet Med; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1096-1104. PubMed ID: 28301460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability in laboratory reporting practices for regions of homozygosity indicating parental relatedness as identified by SNP microarray testing.
    Grote L; Myers M; Lovell A; Saal H; Lipscomb Sund K
    Genet Med; 2012 Dec; 14(12):971-6. PubMed ID: 22791212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misattributed parentage as an unanticipated finding during exome/genome sequencing: current clinical laboratory practices and an opportunity for standardization.
    Eno C; Bayrak-Toydemir P; Bean L; Braxton A; Chao EC; El-Khechen D; Esplin ED; Friedman B; Hagman KDF; Hambuch T; Hernandez A; Juusola J; Londre G; Machado J; Mao R; Mighion L; Rehm HL; Ward P; Deignan JL
    Genet Med; 2019 Apr; 21(4):861-866. PubMed ID: 30214068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Criteria for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome sequencing - a focus group study on professional practices and perspectives in Belgian genetic centres.
    Saelaert M; Mertes H; Moerenhout T; De Baere E; Devisch I
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Aug; 12(1):123. PubMed ID: 31429751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Good laboratory practices for biochemical genetic testing and newborn screening for inherited metabolic disorders.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Recomm Rep; 2012 Apr; 61(RR-2):1-44. PubMed ID: 22475884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
    Shahmirzadi L; Chao EC; Palmaer E; Parra MC; Tang S; Gonzalez KD
    Genet Med; 2014 May; 16(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 24113345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
    McGuire AL; Joffe S; Koenig BA; Biesecker BB; McCullough LB; Blumenthal-Barby JS; Caulfield T; Terry SF; Green RC
    Science; 2013 May; 340(6136):1047-8. PubMed ID: 23686340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of laboratory reporting practices using a quality assessment of a virtual patient.
    Vears DF; Elferink M; Kriek M; Borry P; van Gassen KL
    Genet Med; 2021 Mar; 23(3):562-570. PubMed ID: 33122805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical exome sequencing reports: current informatics practice and future opportunities.
    Swaminathan R; Huang Y; Astbury C; Fitzgerald-Butt S; Miller K; Cole J; Bartlett C; Lin S
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Nov; 24(6):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 28535206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genome sequencing and carrier testing: decisions on categorization and whether to disclose results of carrier testing.
    Himes P; Kauffman TL; Muessig KR; Amendola LM; Berg JS; Dorschner MO; Gilmore M; Nickerson DA; Reiss JA; Richards CS; Rope AF; Simpson DK; Wilfond BS; Jarvik GP; Goddard KAB
    Genet Med; 2017 Jul; 19(7):803-808. PubMed ID: 28079899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
    Berg JS; Amendola LM; Eng C; Van Allen E; Gray SW; Wagle N; Rehm HL; DeChene ET; Dulik MC; Hisama FM; Burke W; Spinner NB; Garraway L; Green RC; Plon S; Evans JP; Jarvik GP;
    Genet Med; 2013 Nov; 15(11):860-7. PubMed ID: 24195999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting practices for unsolicited and secondary findings from next-generation sequencing technologies: Perspectives of laboratory personnel.
    Vears DF; Sénécal K; Borry P
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Aug; 38(8):905-911. PubMed ID: 28512758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-year experience of a CAP/ACMG methods-based external proficiency testing program for laboratories offering DNA sequencing for rare inherited disorders.
    Richards CS; Palomaki GE; Lacbawan FL; Lyon E; Feldman GL;
    Genet Med; 2014 Jan; 16(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23703682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.