These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2781238)

  • 1. Gastric aspiration versus antimony and glass pH electrodes. A simultaneous comparative in vivo study.
    Savarino V; Mela GS; Zentilin P; Magnolia MR; Scalabrini P; Valle F; Moretti M; Bonifacino G; Celle G
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1989 May; 24(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 2781238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity.
    Mela GS; Savarino V; Moretti M; Sumberaz A; Bonifacino G; Zentilin P; Caputo E; Villa G; Celle G
    Dig Dis Sci; 1990 Dec; 35(12):1473-81. PubMed ID: 2253532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 24-H comparison between pH values of continuous intraluminal recording and simultaneous gastric aspiration.
    Savarino V; Mela GS; Scalabrini P; Magnolia MR; Percario G; Di Timoteo E; Celle G
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1987 Mar; 22(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 3576125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identical 24-hour gastric pH profiles when using intragastric antimony or glass electrodes or aspirated gastric juice.
    Andersen J; Naesdal J; Ström M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1988 Apr; 23(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 3387903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous comparison of 24-hour intragastric pH recording using glass and antimony electrodes in man.
    Angerer M; Koelzow H; Londong W
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():38-45. PubMed ID: 2225518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of 24-hour gastric pH in normal controls and patients with duodenal ulcer or atrophic gastritis].
    Pestiaux A; Ooghe P; Van Cauter J; Henry JP; Ligny G
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1990; 14(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 2365174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glass and antimony electrodes for long-term pH monitoring: a dynamic in vitro comparison.
    Geus WP; Smout AJ; Kooiman JC; Lamers CB; Gues JW
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1995 Jan; 7(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 7866807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Acid-related pathology and prolonged continuous gastric pH monitoring. Physiopathologic findings and therapeutic implications].
    Celle G; Savarino V; Mela GS
    Recenti Prog Med; 1989 Sep; 80(9):485-92. PubMed ID: 2574489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A single intragastric pH electrode does not accurately measure intragastric acidity.
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Senior J; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8651165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antimony electrodes. Mucosal potential differences and buffer composition adversely affect pH measurements in the stomach.
    Opekun AR; Smith JL; Graham DY
    Dig Dis Sci; 1990 Aug; 35(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 2384040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Value and use of endoscopic pH measurement in gastroduodenal pathology].
    Sartori S; Trevisani L; Pazzi P; Potena A; Stabellini G
    Minerva Med; 1985 May; 76(22-23):1077-84. PubMed ID: 4011008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparative assessment of gastric secretory function using a probe method and intragastric Ph-metry].
    Medvedev VN; Zelenskaia LM; Orlovskiĭ VF; Dotsenko NIa; Medvedeva VN; Protsenko NN; Kriukova TM
    Klin Med (Mosk); 1990 Mar; 68(3):89-92. PubMed ID: 2370764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of 24-hour gastric pH in control subjects, in patients with duodenal ulcer and in patients with atrophic gastritis].
    Ooghe P; Pestiaux A; Van Cauter J; Henry JP; Ligny G
    Rev Med Brux; 1989 Jun; 10(6):239-44. PubMed ID: 2772461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Stomach probe for simultaneous double-electrode intragastric pH measurement and the aspiration of the stomach contents].
    Bershadenko DD; Korzh NI; Novoselets SA
    Lab Delo; 1982; (2):77-9. PubMed ID: 6174816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of gastric aspiration and continuous pH monitoring with antimony electrode: methodological remarks.
    Savarino V; Mela GS
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():23-30. PubMed ID: 2225515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Gastric secretion using an aspiration pH probe with pentagastrin stimulation].
    Geller AL
    Lab Delo; 1982; (2):75-7. PubMed ID: 6174815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alkaline oesophageal reflux--an artefact due to oxygen corrosion of antimony pH electrodes.
    Sjöberg F; Gustafsson U; Tibbling L
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1992 Dec; 27(12):1084-8. PubMed ID: 1475627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gastric aspiration technique for pH recording: a critical evaluation of this method.
    Dammann HG; Dreyer M; Kangah R; Wolf N
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():3-9. PubMed ID: 2225516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Slimline vs. glass pH electrodes: what degree of accuracy should we expect?
    Pandolfino JE; Ghosh S; Zhang Q; Heath M; Bombeck T; Kahrilas PJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Jan; 23(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 16393314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrochemical aspects of pH electrodes.
    Emde C
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():18-22. PubMed ID: 2225514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.