208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27812449)
1. Validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire Brazilian-Portuguese version.
Martinez BR; Staboli IM; Kamonseki DH; Budiman-Mak E; Yi LC
Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1810. PubMed ID: 27812449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Foot Function Index.
Wu SH; Liang HW; Hou WH
J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Feb; 107(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 18285243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Turkish version of the Revised Foot Function Index for patients with foot and ankle disorders.
Yagci G; Erel S; Okunakol V
Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(6):624-629. PubMed ID: 31431327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle.
Angthong C
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot disorders.
Anaforoğlu Külünkoğlu B; Fırat N; Yıldız NT; Alkan A
Turk J Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 48(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 29914240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Foot Function Index for Arabic-speaking patients (FFI-Ar): translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation study.
Khan S; Faulkner S; Algarni FS; Almalki A; Almansour A; Altowaijri AM
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 17(1):212. PubMed ID: 35392981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thai version of the foot function index: a cross-cultural adaptation with reliability and validity evaluation.
Bovonsunthonchai S; Thong-On S; Vachalathiti R; Intiravoranont W; Suwannarat S; Smith R
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2020; 12():56. PubMed ID: 32944253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Foot Function Index.
Huh JW; Eun IS; Ko YC; Park MJ; Hwang KM; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(4):759-61. PubMed ID: 27067199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index (FFI-I) for patients with plantar fasciitis.
Vetrano M; Vulpiani MC; Erroi D; Vadalà A; Ferretti A; Saraceni VM
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2014 Oct; 54(5):636-43. PubMed ID: 25270783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation and validation of the German version of the foot and ankle outcome score.
van Bergen CJ; Sierevelt IN; Hoogervorst P; Waizy H; van Dijk CN; Becher C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jul; 134(7):897-901. PubMed ID: 24748232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases.
Martinelli N; Scotto GM; Sartorelli E; Bonifacini C; Bianchi A; Malerba F
Qual Life Res; 2014 Feb; 23(1):277-84. PubMed ID: 23689933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Psychometric properties of the Norwegian foot function index revised short form".
Mørk M; Hoksrud AF; Soberg HL; Zucknick M; Heide M; Groven KS; Røe C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 May; 23(1):416. PubMed ID: 35505330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran.
Negahban H; Mazaheri M; Salavati M; Sohani SM; Askari M; Fanian H; Parnianpour M
Clin Rheumatol; 2010 May; 29(5):479-86. PubMed ID: 20140474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Translation, validity, and reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) - Turkish version.
Aydin Yağcioğlu G; Karapınar M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2023 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 37158698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) for use in Brazil.
Lopes AD; Ciconelli RM; Carrera EF; Griffin S; Faloppa F; Dos Reis FB
Clin J Sport Med; 2008 May; 18(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 18469569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index for use in German-speaking patients with foot complaints.
Naal FD; Impellizzeri FM; Huber M; Rippstein PF
Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1222-8. PubMed ID: 19138487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).
van den Akker-Scheek I; Seldentuis A; Reininga IH; Stevens M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jun; 14():183. PubMed ID: 23758917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score.
Karatepe AG; Günaydin R; Kaya T; Karlibaş U; Özbek G
Rheumatol Int; 2009 Dec; 30(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 19370349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System.
Ramos Marinho AP; Nunes GS; Benetti M; de Noronha M
Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Apr; 42(8):1183-1189. PubMed ID: 30638087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Foot Function Index in Patients with Foot Disorders.
Mousavian A; Mohammadi A; Seyed-Hosseinian SH; Shahpari O; Elahpour N; Orooji A; Ebrahimzadeh MH; Moradi A
Arch Bone Jt Surg; 2019 May; 7(3):291-296. PubMed ID: 31312689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
