BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27812763)

  • 1. Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia following frontline bendamustine plus rituximab treatment in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single center, real-life experience.
    Cerchione C; De Renzo A; Di Perna M; Della Pepa R; Pugliese N; Catalano L; Pane F; Picardi M
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Mar; 25(3):839-845. PubMed ID: 27812763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of primary and secondary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced and febrile neutropenia in bendamustine plus rituximab regimens in patients with lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: real-world, single-center experience.
    Moore L; Bartels T; Persky DO; Abraham I; Kumar A; McBride A
    Support Care Cancer; 2021 Aug; 29(8):4867-4874. PubMed ID: 33547525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang L; Baser O; Kutikova L; Page JH; Barron R
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Nov; 23(11):3131-40. PubMed ID: 25821144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy].
    Kataoka T; Sakurashita H; Taogoshi T; Nishigakiuchi R; Murase T; Izumitani S; Saeki Y; Matsuo H
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2019; 139(4):629-633. PubMed ID: 30930398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.
    Salmon JP; Smakal M; Karanikiotis C; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Omnes Y; DeCosta L; Wetten S; O'Kelly J
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 30259136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
    Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Langeberg WJ; Siozon CC; Page JH; Morrow PK; Chia VM
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Aug; 22(8):2167-75. PubMed ID: 24652049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.
    Gebremariam GT; Fentie AM; Beyene K; Sander B; Gebretekle GB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1600. PubMed ID: 36585648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
    Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost-benefit and quality of life analysis.
    Lee S; Knox A; Zeng IS; Coomarasamy C; Blacklock H; Issa S
    Support Care Cancer; 2013 Mar; 21(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 22972488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
    Rifkin RM; Crawford J; Mahtani RL; Dale DC; Narang M; MacLaughlin WW; Huynh C; Gawade PL; Lewis S; DeCosta L; Lawrence T; Belani R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):7913-7922. PubMed ID: 35732748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cooper KL; Madan J; Whyte S; Stevenson MD; Akehurst RL
    BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():404. PubMed ID: 21943360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia after receipt of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in older patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Calip GS; Moran KM; Sweiss KI; Patel PR; Wu Z; Adimadhyam S; Lee TA; Ko NY; Quigley JG; Chiu BC
    Cancer; 2019 Apr; 125(7):1143-1154. PubMed ID: 30548485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of PegaGen
    Jenabian A; Ehsanpour A; Mortazavizadeh SMR; Raafat J; Razavi M; Khosravi A; Seifi S; Salimi B; Anjidani N; Kafi H
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):8151-8158. PubMed ID: 35792924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.