246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27812791)
1. Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.
Lasnon C; Salomon T; Desmonts C; Dô P; Oulkhouir Y; Madelaine J; Aide N
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 27812791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer.
Houdu B; Lasnon C; Licaj I; Thomas G; Do P; Guizard AV; Desmonts C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):421-428. PubMed ID: 30218317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Lasnon C; Robin P; Hofman MS; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns DS; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 27283930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Lasnon C; Desmonts C; Quak E; Gervais R; Do P; Dubos-Arvis C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jul; 40(7):985-96. PubMed ID: 23564036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on thoracic lymph node staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer.
Lasnon C; Hicks RJ; Beauregard JM; Milner A; Paciencia M; Guizard AV; Bardet S; Gervais R; Lemoel G; Zalcman G; Aide N
Clin Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 37(10):971-6. PubMed ID: 22899197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EORTC PET response criteria are more influenced by reconstruction inconsistencies than PERCIST but both benefit from the EARL harmonization program.
Lasnon C; Quak E; Le Roux PY; Robin P; Hofman MS; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns DS; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
EJNMMI Phys; 2017 Dec; 4(1):17. PubMed ID: 28560574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic
Machado MAD; Menezes VO; Namías M; Vieira NS; Queiroz CC; Matheoud R; Alessio AM; Oliveira ML
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 30076252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the standard uptake value (SUV) appropriate for quantification in clinical PET imaging? - Variability induced by different SUV measurements and varying reconstruction methods.
Brendle C; Kupferschläger J; Nikolaou K; la Fougère C; Gatidis S; Pfannenberg C
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):158-162. PubMed ID: 25467224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of PET reconstruction technique and matrix size on qualitative and quantitative assessment of lung lesions on [18F]-FDG-PET: A prospective study in 37 cancer patients.
Riegler G; Karanikas G; Rausch I; Hirtl A; El-Rabadi K; Marik W; Pivec C; Weber M; Prosch H; Mayerhoefer M
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():20-26. PubMed ID: 28583635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the EARL harmonization program on automatic delineation of metabolic active tumour volumes (MATVs).
Lasnon C; Enilorac B; Popotte H; Aide N
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):30. PubMed ID: 28361349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of histopathologically confirmed mediastinal lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer using a penalised likelihood reconstruction.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Bradley KM; Belcher E; Black E; Moore A; Sykes A; Gleeson FV
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):4098-4106. PubMed ID: 26914696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical respiratory motion correction software (reconstruct, register and averaged-RRA), for
Bouyeure-Petit AC; Chastan M; Edet-Sanson A; Becker S; Thureau S; Houivet E; Vera P; Hapdey S
Br J Radiol; 2017 Feb; 90(1070):20160549. PubMed ID: 27936893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of (18)F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT using point spread function reconstruction for nodal staging of colorectal cancer.
Kawashima K; Kato K; Tomabechi M; Matsuo M; Otsuka K; Ishida K; Nakamura R; Ehara S
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150938. PubMed ID: 27146065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How Often Do We Fail to Classify the Treatment Response with [
Mattoli MV; Calcagni ML; Taralli S; Indovina L; Spottiswoode BS; Giordano A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 30850971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.
Akamatsu G; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 24144448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
