192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27812796)
1. Constraints on Development of Wind Energy in Poland due to Environmental Objectives. Is There Space in Poland for Wind Farm Siting?
Hajto M; Cichocki Z; Bidłasik M; Borzyszkowski J; Kuśmierz A
Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 59(2):204-217. PubMed ID: 27812796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental management framework for wind farm siting: methodology and case study.
Tegou LI; Polatidis H; Haralambopoulos DA
J Environ Manage; 2010 Nov; 91(11):2134-47. PubMed ID: 20541310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An integrated assessment for wind energy in Lake Michigan coastal counties.
Nordman E; VanderMolen J; Gajewski B; Isely P; Fan Y; Koches J; Damm S; Ferguson A; Schoolmaster C
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Apr; 11(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 25377179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A GIS-based multi-criteria model for offshore wind energy power plants site selection in both sides of the Aegean Sea.
Tercan E; Tapkın S; Latinopoulos D; Dereli MA; Tsiropoulos A; Ak MF
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Sep; 192(10):652. PubMed ID: 32964332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GIS-based weighted overlay model for wind and solar farm locating in Sri Lanka.
Kahatapitiya C; Jayasooriya VM; Muthukumaran S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(44):98947-98965. PubMed ID: 36562971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MCDM analysis of wind energy in Turkey: decision making based on environmental impact.
Değirmenci S; Bingöl F; Sofuoglu SC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jul; 25(20):19753-19766. PubMed ID: 29736652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardizing the factors used in wind farm site suitability models: A review.
Wimhurst JJ; Nsude CC; Greene JS
Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15903. PubMed ID: 37168883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A modelling approach for offshore wind farm feasibility with respect to ecosystem-based marine spatial planning.
Pınarbaşı K; Galparsoro I; Depellegrin D; Bald J; Pérez-Morán G; Borja Á
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 667():306-317. PubMed ID: 30831368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study on offshore wind farm siting criteria using a novel interval-valued fuzzy-rough based Delphi method.
Deveci M; Özcan E; John R; Covrig CF; Pamucar D
J Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 270():110916. PubMed ID: 32721349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The combination of fuzzy analytical hierarchical process and maximum entropy methods for the selection of wind farm location.
Unal Cilek M; Guner ED; Tekin S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(43):65391-65406. PubMed ID: 35486277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporating land-use requirements and environmental constraints in low-carbon electricity planning for California.
Wu GC; Torn MS; Williams JH
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(4):2013-21. PubMed ID: 25541644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-criteria of wind-solar site selection problem using a GIS-AHP-based approach with an application in Igdir Province/Turkey.
Koc A; Turk S; Şahin G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(31):32298-32310. PubMed ID: 31598925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wind farm topology-finding algorithm considering performance, costs, and environmental impacts.
Tazi N; Chatelet E; Bouzidi Y; Meziane R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):24526-24534. PubMed ID: 28585005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hot air ablowin! 'Media-speak', social conflict, and the Australian 'decoupled' wind farm controversy.
Hindmarsh R
Soc Stud Sci; 2014 Apr; 44(2):194-217. PubMed ID: 24941611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the cumulative exposure of wildlife to offshore wind energy development.
Goodale MW; Milman A
J Environ Manage; 2019 Apr; 235():77-83. PubMed ID: 30677658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-criteria decision analysis for wind farm location selection in Bahir Dar City and its surroundings, Northwestern Ethiopia.
Yegizaw ES; Mengistu DA
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Apr; 195(5):559. PubMed ID: 37046150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ecological impact assessments fail to reduce risk of bat casualties at wind farms.
Lintott PR; Richardson SM; Hosken DJ; Fensome SA; Mathews F
Curr Biol; 2016 Nov; 26(21):R1135-R1136. PubMed ID: 27825446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wind farm investments portfolio formation using GIS-based suitability analysis and simulation procedures.
Vavatsikos AP; Arvanitidou A; Petsas D
J Environ Manage; 2019 Dec; 252():109670. PubMed ID: 31600687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health impact of wind farms.
Kurpas D; Mroczek B; Karakiewicz B; Kassolik K; Andrzejewski W
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2013; 20(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 24069872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoidance of wind farms by harbour seals is limited to pile driving activities.
Russell DJ; Hastie GD; Thompson D; Janik VM; Hammond PS; Scott-Hayward LA; Matthiopoulos J; Jones EL; McConnell BJ
J Appl Ecol; 2016 Dec; 53(6):1642-1652. PubMed ID: 27867217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
