These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2781300)

  • 1. Abortion: litmus test for NIH director.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Oct; 246(4926):27. PubMed ID: 2781300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion's scientific angle is affecting appointments.
    Brazda JF
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(49):34. PubMed ID: 10296202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal debate continues.
    Palca J
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6224):411. PubMed ID: 2725667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. More disclosure of NIH scientists' private work, pay?
    Med Health; 2004 Jan; 58(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 14959566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perspectives. Fetal transplants: miracle or threat?
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1988 Sep; 42(38):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10289005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The choosing of the NIH director.
    Koshland DE
    Science; 1989 Nov; 246(4933):981. PubMed ID: 2587989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zerhouni proposes major changes to NIH ethics program.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Jul; 96(14):1057. PubMed ID: 15265963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whose misconduct?
    Nature; 1987 Apr 30-May 6; 326(6116):814. PubMed ID: 3574453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives. The U.S. contraceptive gap.
    Munnings F
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 May; 45(19):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10110333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cornell misconduct case grinds slowly to its conclusion.
    Palca J
    Nature; 1987 Apr 30-May 6; 326(6116):816. PubMed ID: 3574455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perspectives. Fetal tissue ban: politicizing science?
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 May; 44(21):suppl 2 p.. PubMed ID: 10104781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health policy and NIH: implications for nursing research.
    Larson E
    Nurs Res; 1984; 33(6):352-6. PubMed ID: 6567865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion PRO: the abortion controversy: will it ever disappear? CON: should we change our attitudes about abortion?
    Burnhill MS; Brendlinger DL
    J Med Soc N J; 1980 Jun; 77(6):450-53. PubMed ID: 6930500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion politics, science, and research ethics: take down the wall of separation.
    Fletcher JC
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():95-121. PubMed ID: 11645741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studies try to sidetrack abortion politics with focus on "pre-embryo".
    Hosp Ethics; 1991; 7(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 10109743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bioethical catch-22: the moratorium on federal funding of fetal tissue transplantation research and the NIH revitalization amendments.
    Maroney HM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():485-519. PubMed ID: 10126947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Senators grill NIH director over restrictions on stem-cell research.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2003 Jun; 49(39):A25. PubMed ID: 15287128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. House of Representatives moves to dismantle NIH AIDS research program. National Institutes of Health.
    Update Natl Minor AIDS Counc; 1995; ():6. PubMed ID: 11362790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
    Segers MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIH panel opens debate on ethics of embryo research.
    Gershon D
    Nature; 1994 Feb; 367(6463):502. PubMed ID: 8107817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.