232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27813439)
1. Virtual acoustic environments for comprehensive evaluation of model-based hearing devices.
Grimm G; Luberadzka J; Hohmann V
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S112-S117. PubMed ID: 27813439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S1-S2. PubMed ID: 29338464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
Johnson EE
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S29-S30. PubMed ID: 28635502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An individualised acoustically transparent earpiece for hearing devices.
Denk F; Hiipakka M; Kollmeier B; Ernst SMA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S62-S70. PubMed ID: 28635506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?
Huber R; Bisitz T; Gerkmann T; Kiessling J; Meister H; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hearing aid fitting and fine-tuning based on estimated individual traits.
Völker C; Ernst SMA; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 27873543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modifications of the MUlti stimulus test with Hidden Reference and Anchor (MUSHRA) for use in audiology.
Völker C; Bisitz T; Huber R; Kollmeier B; Ernst SMA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S92-S104. PubMed ID: 27598985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving uptake and outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older adults: what are the barriers and facilitators?
Hickson L; Meyer C
Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S1-2. PubMed ID: 24528289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the acceptable noise level (ANL) predict hearing-aid use?
Olsen SØ; Brännström KJ
Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 24219089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of compressive properties of the BioAid hearing aid algorithm.
Clark NR; Lecluyse W; Jürgens T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S130-S138. PubMed ID: 28942716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing less.
Tsai A
Diabetes Forecast; 2014 Dec; 67(12):28-30. PubMed ID: 25872362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.
Walravens E; Keidser G; Hartley D; Hickson L
Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functionality of hearing aids: state-of-the-art and future model-based solutions.
Kollmeier B; Kiessling J
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S3-S28. PubMed ID: 27951738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling the Intelligibility Benefit of Active Noise Cancelation in Hearing Devices That Improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
Sabin AT; McElhone D; Gauger D; Rabinowitz B
Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241260029. PubMed ID: 38831646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there evidence for the added value and correct use of manual and automatically switching multimemory hearing devices? A scoping review.
de Graaff F; Huysmans E; Ket JCF; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Leemans CR; Smits C
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):176-183. PubMed ID: 29017358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and psychometric properties of the sound preference and hearing habits questionnaire (SP-HHQ).
Meis M; Huber R; Fischer RL; Schulte M; Spilski J; Meister H
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S118-S129. PubMed ID: 27875658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
