BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27814321)

  • 1. Comparison of noise reduction of earplugs between fit test and coal mine work and observed variability of real-time noise reduction in coal mine work.
    Wu M; Guffey SE; Takacs BC
    Work; 2016 Nov; 55(3):531-538. PubMed ID: 27814321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness evaluation of existing noise controls in a deep shaft underground mine.
    Lutz EA; Reed RJ; Turner D; Littau SR; Lee V; Hu C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 25830445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the hearing protector in a real work situation using the field-microphone-in-real-ear method.
    Rocha CH; Longo IA; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 27191871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
    Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Measurement of real personal noise attenuation using earplugs with the E-A-Rfit system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Scarselletta RS; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2013; 104(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 23879065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noise exposure and hearing conservation in U.S. coal mines--a surveillance report.
    Joy GJ; Middendorf PJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jan; 4(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 17162478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved hearing protector attenuation through the use of a lubricant.
    Ryan TJ; Meier RS; Tatarka A
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Nov; 14(11):931-937. PubMed ID: 28763289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating hearing loss risks in the mining industry through MSHA citations.
    Sun K; Azman AS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Mar; 15(3):246-262. PubMed ID: 29200378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise attenuation of earplugs as measured by hREAT and F-MIRE methods in a Japanese metal manufacturing plant.
    Kabe I; Kochi T; Tsuruoka H; Tonegawa T; Denda I; Nonogi M; Tsuiki H; Mizoue T; Tanaka S
    J Occup Health; 2012; 54(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 22673642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
    Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices.
    Voix J; Hager LD
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 19534854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.