165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27814321)
21. Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.
Schulz TY
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):152-62. PubMed ID: 21368441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The efficacy of earplugs at a major hazard facility.
Lee KH; Benke G; Mckenzie D
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Mar; 45(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 35023076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
Neitzel R; Seixas N
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The objective measurement of individual earplug field performance.
Voix J; Laville F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3722-32. PubMed ID: 19507954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Noise attenuation and proper insertion of earplugs into ear canals.
Toivonen M; Pääkkönen R; Savolainen S; Lehtomäki K
Ann Occup Hyg; 2002 Aug; 46(6):527-30. PubMed ID: 12176767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
Abel SM; Odell P
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors.
Lempert BL; Edwards RG
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 44(12):894-902. PubMed ID: 6660189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Factors of work environment hazardous for health in opinions of employees working underground in the 'Bogdanka' coal mine.
Strzemecka J; Goździewska M; Skrodziuk J; Galińska EM; Lachowski S
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2019 Sep; 26(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 31559795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Insertion loss of noise barriers on an aboveground, full-scale model longwall coal mining shearer.
Sweeney DD; Slagley JM; Smith DA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 May; 7(5):272-9. PubMed ID: 20234968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Verifying earplug attenuation and evaluating the effectiveness of one-on-one training along with earplug fit testing at nine facilities in China.
Gong W; Zhang J; Liu X; Ding E; Zhu B
Am J Ind Med; 2021 Sep; 64(9):771-780. PubMed ID: 34250617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Coal workers' pneumoconiosis in the United States: regional differences 40 years after implementation of the 1969 Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act.
Suarthana E; Laney AS; Storey E; Hale JM; Attfield MD
Occup Environ Med; 2011 Dec; 68(12):908-13. PubMed ID: 21597107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.
Pelegrin AC; Canuet L; Rodríguez ÁA; Morales MP
Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):343-9. PubMed ID: 26356377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effectiveness of hearing protector devices in impulse noise verified with transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Bockstael A; Keppler H; Dhooge I; D'haenens W; Maes L; Philips B; Vinck B
Int J Audiol; 2008 Mar; 47(3):119-33. PubMed ID: 18307092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Assessment of the impulse noise attenuation by earplugs in metalworking processes].
Mlyński R; Kozlowski E
Med Pr; 2014; 65(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 25090849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cohort study for the effect of chronic noise exposure on blood pressure among male workers in Busan, Korea.
Lee JH; Kang W; Yaang SR; Choy N; Lee CR
Am J Ind Med; 2009 Jun; 52(6):509-17. PubMed ID: 19267371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.
Murphy WJ; Franks JR; Berger EH; Behar A; Casali JG; Dixon-Ernst C; Krieg EF; Mozo BT; Royster JD; Royster LH; Simon SD; Stephenson C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):311-23. PubMed ID: 14759024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Influencing factors for the use of earplugs in workers exposed to noise in a city].
Zhu QR; Shao YX; Cao CJ; Wu X; Xie WQ; Xu M; Yang L; Xu LW
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 34(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 27514260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of earphone and sound field methods for estimating noise attenuation of foam earplugs.
Carter NL; Upfold G
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Jun; 54(6):307-12. PubMed ID: 8328360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
