These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27814827)

  • 21. Using a tailored web-based intervention to set goals to reduce unnecessary recall.
    Carney PA; Bowles EJ; Sickles EA; Geller BM; Feig SA; Jackson S; Brown D; Cook A; Yankaskas BC; Miglioretti DL; Elmore JG
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21251856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings.
    Rawashdeh MA; Lee WB; Bourne RM; Ryan EA; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard RC; Black DA; Brennan PC
    Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 23737538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.
    Poplack SP; Tosteson TD; Kogel CA; Nagy HM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 17715109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correlation Between Screening Mammography Interpretive Performance on a Test Set and Performance in Clinical Practice.
    Miglioretti DL; Ichikawa L; Smith RA; Buist DSM; Carney PA; Geller B; Monsees B; Onega T; Rosenberg R; Sickles EA; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Oct; 24(10):1256-1264. PubMed ID: 28551400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.
    Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical Utility of Breast MRI in the Diagnosis of Malignancy After Inconclusive or Equivocal Mammographic Diagnostic Evaluation.
    Giess CS; Chikarmane SA; Sippo DA; Birdwell RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1378-1385. PubMed ID: 28267372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a comparison of methods of assessment.
    Lee-Han H; Cooke G; Boyd NF
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1995 Aug; 4(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 7549820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mammographic features of screening detected pT1 (a-b) invasive breast cancer using BI-RADS lexicon.
    Bargalló X; Santamaría G; Velasco M; del Amo M; Arguis P; Burrel M; Capurro S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2620-6. PubMed ID: 22206831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship between breast density, age, and mammographic lesion type among Chinese breast cancer patients from a large clinical dataset.
    Ji Y; Li B; Zhao R; Zhang Y; Liu J; Lu H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Mar; 21(1):43. PubMed ID: 33685388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.
    Hoff SR; Abrahamsen AL; Samset JH; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance Goals for an Adjunct Diagnostic Test to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies After Screening Mammography: Analysis of Costs, Benefits, and Consequences.
    Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R81-R88. PubMed ID: 27814820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of Training on Qualitative Mammographic Density Assessment.
    Raza S; Mackesy MM; Winkler NS; Hurwitz S; Birdwell RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Mar; 13(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 26944039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving radiologist's ability in identifying particular abnormal lesions on mammograms through training test set with immediate feedback.
    Trieu PDY; Lewis SJ; Li T; Ho K; Wong DJ; Tran OTM; Puslednik L; Black D; Brennan PC
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):9899. PubMed ID: 33972611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lesion and patient characteristics associated with malignancy after a probably benign finding on community practice mammography.
    Lehman CD; Rutter CM; Eby PR; White E; Buist DS; Taplin SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):511-5. PubMed ID: 18212240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.
    Sickles EA; Wolverton DE; Dee KE
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):861-9. PubMed ID: 12202726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?
    Henderson LM; Benefield T; Bowling JM; Durham DD; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Yankaskas BC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 25794085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recall and Cancer Detection Rates for Screening Mammography: Finding the Sweet Spot.
    Grabler P; Sighoko D; Wang L; Allgood K; Ansell D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):208-213. PubMed ID: 27680714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influences of Radiology Trainees on Screening Mammography Interpretation.
    Hawley JR; Taylor CR; Cubbison AM; Erdal BS; Yildiz VO; Carkaci S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 May; 13(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 26924162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.