These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27815745)

  • 21. The impact of operative approach on postoperative outcomes and healthcare utilization after colectomy.
    Mlambo B; Shih IF; Li Y; Wren SM
    Surgery; 2022 Feb; 171(2):320-327. PubMed ID: 34362589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider.
    Senagore AJ; Brannigan A; Kiran RP; Brady K; Delaney CP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 May; 48(5):1016-20. PubMed ID: 15785881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated with Improved Outcomes Following Urgent Inpatient Colectomy.
    Hajirawala LN; Krishnan V; Leonardi C; Bevier-Rawls ER; Orangio GR; Davis KG; Klinger AL; Barton JS
    JSLS; 2022; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 35281708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
    Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Open versus minimally invasive ureteroneocystostomy: A population-level analysis.
    Wang HH; Tejwani R; Cannon GM; Gargollo PC; Wiener JS; Routh JC
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):232.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27140001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of laparoscopic surgery on health care utilization and costs in patients who undergo colectomy.
    Crawshaw BP; Chien HL; Augestad KM; Delaney CP
    JAMA Surg; 2015 May; 150(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 25806476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Younger and Older Patients: An Analysis of Nationwide Readmission Database.
    Mehta HB; Hughes BD; Sieloff E; Sura SO; Shan Y; Adhikari D; Senagore A
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Apr; 28(4):370-378. PubMed ID: 29237139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications.
    Tejwani R; Young BJ; Wang HS; Wolf S; Purves JT; Wiener JS; Routh JC
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Jun; 13(3):283.e1-283.e9. PubMed ID: 28344019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy.
    Groves DK; Altieri MS; Sullivan B; Yang J; Talamini MA; Pryor AD
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Nov; 22(11):1870-1880. PubMed ID: 29980972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Fusion in Italy and the United Kingdom.
    Vertuani S; Nilsson J; Borgman B; Buseghin G; Leonard C; Assietti R; Quraishi NA
    Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):810-6. PubMed ID: 26409608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do the advantages of a minimally invasive approach remain in complex colorectal procedures? A nationwide comparison.
    Schlussel AT; Lustik MB; Johnson EK; Maykel JA; Champagne BJ; Goldberg JE; Steele SR
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Apr; 58(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 25751800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era.
    Tyler JA; Fox JP; Desai MM; Perry WB; Glasgow SC
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Apr; 56(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 23478613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Health-care expenditures are less for minimally invasive than open colectomy for colon cancer: A US commercial claims database analysis.
    Bastawrous AL; Shih IF; Li Y; Khalil M; Almaz B; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6278-6287. PubMed ID: 37193891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition.
    Keller DS; Qiu J; Kiran RP
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Oct; 23(10):965-972. PubMed ID: 31598786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Economic burden of postoperative ileus associated with colectomy in the United States.
    Iyer S; Saunders WB; Stemkowski S
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2009; 15(6):485-94. PubMed ID: 19610681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of venous thromboembolism before open or minimally-invasive radical cystectomy in the USA: insurance claims data on perioperative outcomes and healthcare costs.
    Del Giudice F; Tresh A; Li S; Basran S; Prendiville SG; Belladelli F; DE Berardinis E; Asero V; Scornajenghi CM; Carino D; Ferro M; Rocco B; Busetto GM; Falagario U; Autorino R; Crocetto F; Barone B; Pradere B; Krajewski W; Nowak Ł; Szydełko T; Moschini M; Mari A; Crivellaro S; Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Amparore D; Pichler R; Rane A; Challacombe B; Nair R; Chung BI
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2024 Jun; 76(3):320-330. PubMed ID: 38920012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.