These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27816713)
1. Development of predictive models for predicting binding affinity of endocrine disrupting chemicals to fish sex hormone-binding globulin. Liu H; Yang X; Yin C; Wei M; He X Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Feb; 136():46-54. PubMed ID: 27816713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of QSAR models for predicting the binding affinity of endocrine disrupting chemicals to eight fish estrogen receptor. He J; Peng T; Yang X; Liu H Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Feb; 148():211-219. PubMed ID: 29055205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of classification model and QSAR model for predicting binding affinity of endocrine disrupting chemicals to human sex hormone-binding globulin. Liu H; Yang X; Lu R Chemosphere; 2016 Aug; 156():1-7. PubMed ID: 27156209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep learning driven QSAR model for environmental toxicology: Effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals on human health. Heo S; Safder U; Yoo C Environ Pollut; 2019 Oct; 253():29-38. PubMed ID: 31302400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Salinity and sensitivity to endocrine disrupting chemicals: A comparison of reproductive endpoints in small-bodied fish exposed under different salinities. Bosker T; Santoro G; Melvin SD Chemosphere; 2017 Sep; 183():186-196. PubMed ID: 28549324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational prediction models for assessing endocrine disrupting potential of chemicals. Sakkiah S; Guo W; Pan B; Kusko R; Tong W; Hong H J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2018; 36(4):192-218. PubMed ID: 30633647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computational insights into the molecular interactions of environmental xenoestrogens 4-tert-octylphenol, 4-nonylphenol, bisphenol A (BPA), and BPA metabolite, 4-methyl-2, 4-bis (4-hydroxyphenyl) pent-1-ene (MBP) with human sex hormone-binding globulin. Sheikh IA; Tayubi IA; Ahmad E; Ganaie MA; Bajouh OS; AlBasri SF; Abdulkarim IMJ; Beg MA Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Jan; 135():284-291. PubMed ID: 27750096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human sex hormone-binding globulin binding affinities of 125 structurally diverse chemicals and comparison with their binding to androgen receptor, estrogen receptor, and α-fetoprotein. Hong H; Branham WS; Ng HW; Moland CL; Dial SL; Fang H; Perkins R; Sheehan D; Tong W Toxicol Sci; 2015 Feb; 143(2):333-48. PubMed ID: 25349334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling the binding affinity of steroids to zebrafish sex hormone-binding globulin. Saxena AK; Devillers J; Pery AR; Beaudouin R; Balaramnavar VM; Ahmed S SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(5):407-21. PubMed ID: 24874994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In silico methods in the discovery of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Vuorinen A; Odermatt A; Schuster D J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2013 Sep; 137():18-26. PubMed ID: 23688835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Urban Endocrine Disruptors Targeting Breast Cancer Proteins. Montes-Grajales D; Bernardes GJ; Olivero-Verbel J Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 Feb; 29(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 26700111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the sensitivity of three North American fish species to disruptors of steroidogenesis using in vitro tissue explants. Beitel SC; Doering JA; Patterson SE; Hecker M Aquat Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 152():273-83. PubMed ID: 24800870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differing species responsiveness of estrogenic contaminants in fish is conferred by the ligand binding domain of the estrogen receptor. Miyagawa S; Lange A; Hirakawa I; Tohyama S; Ogino Y; Mizutani T; Kagami Y; Kusano T; Ihara M; Tanaka H; Tatarazako N; Ohta Y; Katsu Y; Tyler CR; Iguchi T Environ Sci Technol; 2014 May; 48(9):5254-63. PubMed ID: 24689804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endocrine-disrupting activity of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: Exploring combined approaches of ligand and structure based modeling. Kar S; SepĂșlveda MS; Roy K; Leszczynski J Chemosphere; 2017 Oct; 184():514-523. PubMed ID: 28622647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distribution and bioaccumulation of steroidal and phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in wild fish species from Dianchi Lake, China. Liu J; Wang R; Huang B; Lin C; Wang Y; Pan X Environ Pollut; 2011 Oct; 159(10):2815-22. PubMed ID: 21645950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ANN and Bayesian classification models for virtual screening of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Nowicki P; Klos J; Kokot Z Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2014; 17(5):407-16. PubMed ID: 24547995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Classifying chemical mode of action using gene networks and machine learning: a case study with the herbicide linuron. Ornostay A; Cowie AM; Hindle M; Baker CJ; Martyniuk CJ Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics; 2013 Dec; 8(4):263-74. PubMed ID: 24013142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interference of endocrine disrupting chemicals with aromatase CYP19 expression or activity, and consequences for reproduction of teleost fish. Cheshenko K; Pakdel F; Segner H; Kah O; Eggen RI Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2008 Jan; 155(1):31-62. PubMed ID: 17459383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Challenges and opportunities with the use of biomarkers to predict reproductive impairment in fishes exposed to endocrine disrupting substances. Bosker T; Munkittrick KR; Maclatchy DL Aquat Toxicol; 2010 Oct; 100(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 20727601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]