BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

818 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27816924)

  • 1. Men's knowledge of their own fertility: a population-based survey examining the awareness of factors that are associated with male infertility.
    Daumler D; Chan P; Lo KC; Takefman J; Zelkowitz P
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2781-2790. PubMed ID: 27816924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Childless Canadian men's and women's childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction.
    Daniluk JC; Koert E
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Aug; 27(8):2405-12. PubMed ID: 22684907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of knowledge and perceived susceptibility in intentions to optimize fertility: findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study (IFDMS).
    Fulford B; Bunting L; Tsibulsky I; Boivin J
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3253-62. PubMed ID: 24105825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dyadic dynamics of perceived social support in couples facing infertility.
    Martins MV; Peterson BD; Almeida V; Mesquita-Guimarães J; Costa ME
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jan; 29(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 24218401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do young men want to receive information about fertility? Young men's attitudes towards a fertility campaign targeting men in Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Berthelsen ASN; Gamby ALN; Christensen U; Schmidt L; Koert E
    Hum Reprod Open; 2021; 2021(3):hoab027. PubMed ID: 34322604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Men's knowledge, attitudes and behaviours relating to fertility.
    Hammarberg K; Collins V; Holden C; Young K; McLachlan R
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Jul; 23(4):458-480. PubMed ID: 28333354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial: knowledge and reproductive outcome after online fertility education.
    Maeda E; Boivin J; Toyokawa S; Murata K; Saito H
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2035-2042. PubMed ID: 30265305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The acceptability of stem cell-based fertility treatments for different indications.
    Hendriks S; Dancet EAF; Vliegenthart R; Repping S
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 23(12):855-863. PubMed ID: 28460040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The other side of the fertility coin: a comparison of childless men's and women's knowledge of fertility and assisted reproductive technology.
    Daniluk JC; Koert E
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(3):839-46. PubMed ID: 23148926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fertility knowledge and beliefs about fertility treatment: findings from the International Fertility Decision-making Study.
    Bunting L; Tsibulsky I; Boivin J
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):385-97. PubMed ID: 23184181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs.
    Daniluk JC; Koert E
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):353-63. PubMed ID: 25480922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Childless women's beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing for social and medical reasons.
    Daniluk JC; Koert E
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2313-20. PubMed ID: 27591238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for poor sperm morphology.
    Pacey AA; Povey AC; Clyma JA; McNamee R; Moore HD; Baillie H; Cherry NM;
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1629-36. PubMed ID: 24899128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cumulative incidence rate of medical consultation for fecundity problems--analysis of a prevalent cohort using competing risks.
    Duron S; Slama R; Ducot B; Bohet A; Sørensen DN; Keiding N; Moreau C; Bouyer J
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2872-9. PubMed ID: 23838160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An experimental evaluation of the benefits and costs of providing fertility information to adolescents and emerging adults.
    Boivin J; Koert E; Harris T; O'Shea L; Perryman A; Parker K; Harrison C
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1247-1253. PubMed ID: 29788136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occurrence of fertility problems presenting to primary care: population-level estimates of clinical burden and socioeconomic inequalities across the UK.
    Dhalwani NN; Fiaschi L; West J; Tata LJ
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Apr; 28(4):960-8. PubMed ID: 23315065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. You did not turn up… I did not realise I was invited…: understanding male attitudes towards engagement in fertility and reproductive health discussions.
    Grace B; Shawe J; Johnson S; Stephenson J
    Hum Reprod Open; 2019; 2019(3):hoz014. PubMed ID: 31218265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FSHB -211 G>T is a major genetic modulator of reproductive physiology and health in childbearing age women.
    Rull K; Grigorova M; Ehrenberg A; Vaas P; Sekavin A; Nõmmemees D; Adler M; Hanson E; Juhanson P; Laan M
    Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):954-966. PubMed ID: 29617818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infertility management in women and men attending primary care-patient characteristics, management actions and referrals.
    Chambers GM; Harrison C; Raymer J; Petersen Raymer AK; Britt H; Chapman M; Ledger W; Norman RJ
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2173-2183. PubMed ID: 31725877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of childhood mortality in family members of men with poor semen quality.
    Hanson HA; Mayer EN; Anderson RE; Aston KI; Carrell DT; Berger J; Lowrance WT; Smith KR; Hotaling JM
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):239-247. PubMed ID: 27927843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.