147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27816973)
1. Tachysystole Following Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor Is Not Associated with Adverse Outcomes.
Bofill JA; Darby MM; Castillo J; Sawardecker SU; Magann EF; Morrison JC
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(5):487-493. PubMed ID: 27816973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study.
Sichitiu J; Vial Y; Panchaud A; Baud D; Desseauve D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():54-58. PubMed ID: 32361173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnancies with oligohydramnios.
Dede FS; Haberal A; Dede H; Sivaslioglu A; Arslanpence I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2004; 57(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 14707473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction.
Kashanian M; Akbarian AR; Fekrat M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Jan; 92(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 16246342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of titrated oral misoprostol and a conventional oral regimen for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Thaisomboon A; Russameecharoen K; Wanitpongpan P; Phattanachindakun B; Changnoi A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Jan; 116(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 21959071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal heart rate patterns and the incidence of adverse events after oral misoprostol administration for cervical ripening among low-risk pregnancies.
Kandahari N; Tucker LS; Schneider AN; Raine-Bennett TR; Mohta VJ
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2199344. PubMed ID: 37031970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol solution between nulliparous and multiparous women.
Cheng SY; Hsue CS; Hwang GH; Chen W; Li TC
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20178530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining uterine tachysystole: how much is too much?
Stewart RD; Bleich AT; Lo JY; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 207(4):290.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22901710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety of misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction using standard vs. adjusted retrieval criteria: a comparative cohort study.
Brandstetter A; Döbert M; Schwaerzler P; Döbert TF; Hasselbeck H; Henrich W
J Perinat Med; 2020 Jun; 48(5):488-494. PubMed ID: 32304314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Labor outcomes of obese patients undergoing induction of labor with misoprostol compared to dinoprostone.
Suidan RS; Rondon KC; Apuzzio JJ; Williams SF
Am J Perinatol; 2015 Feb; 30(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 24915563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Diro M; Adra A; Gilles JM; Nassar A; Rodriguez A; Salamat SM; Beydoun SN; O'Sullivan MJ; Yasin SY; Burkett G
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomization of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in a low resource setting.
Adeniyi AA; Odukogbe AA; Olayemi A; Oladokun O; Adeniji AO; Aimakhu CO; Enakpene C
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 24714004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal misoprostol and cervical ripening balloon for induction of labor in late-term pregnancies.
Duro Gómez J; Garrido Oyarzún MF; Rodríguez Marín AB; de la Torre González AJ; Arjona Berral JE; Castelo-Branco C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Jan; 43(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 27928864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
