These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Does text contrast mediate binocular advantages in reading? Jainta S; Nikolova M; Liversedge SP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 27797549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials. Degno F; Loberg O; Zang C; Zhang M; Donnelly N; Liversedge SP J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):453-474. PubMed ID: 30335444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of contrast on monocular versus binocular reading performance. Johansson J; Pansell T; Ygge J; Seimyr GÖ J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):8. PubMed ID: 24829225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing. Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference? Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations. Veldre A; Andrews S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level? Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binocular summation for grating detection and resolution in foveal and peripheral vision. Zlatkova MB; Anderson RS; Ennis FA Vision Res; 2001 Nov; 41(24):3093-100. PubMed ID: 11711136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading. Plummer P; Rayner K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading. Risse S; Kliegl R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading. Luke SG Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 30088258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading. Payne BR; Stites MC; Federmeier KD J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1839-1857. PubMed ID: 27428778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing. Grant S Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3489-505. PubMed ID: 26298046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading. Schotter ER; Leinenger M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness. Veldre A; Andrews S Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]