These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27820223)
41. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates. Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A; Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study. Kushnir VM; Oh YS; Hollander T; Chen CH; Sayuk GS; Davidson N; Mullady D; Murad FM; Sharabash NM; Ruettgers E; Dassopoulos T; Easler JJ; Gyawali CP; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 110(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 25732415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study. De Palma GD; Giglio MC; Bruzzese D; Gennarelli N; Maione F; Siciliano S; Manzo B; Cassese G; Luglio G Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jan; 87(1):232-240. PubMed ID: 28082115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates. Madhoun MF; Tierney WM Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Missed adenomas with behind-folds visualizing colonoscopy technologies compared with standard colonoscopy: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized back-to-back tandem colonoscopy studies. Brand EC; Dik VK; van Oijen MGH; Siersema PD Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):376-385.e2. PubMed ID: 28069476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population. Chiu HM; Lin JT; Lee YC; Liang JT; Shun CT; Wang HP; Wu MS Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Dec; 54(12):1570-7. PubMed ID: 22067187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography screening strategies in the detection and recovery of subcentimeter adenomas. Benson M; Dureja P; Gopal D; Reichelderfer M; Pfau PR Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 105(12):2578-85. PubMed ID: 20842111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The effect of small or diminutive adenomas at baseline colonoscopy on the risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia: KASID multicenter study. Moon CM; Jung SA; Eun CS; Park JJ; Seo GS; Cha JM; Park SC; Chun J; Lee HJ; Jung Y; Boo SJ; Kim JO; Joo YE; Park DI Dig Liver Dis; 2018 Aug; 50(8):847-852. PubMed ID: 29730157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate. Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Impact of bowel preparation on surveillance colonoscopy interval. Singhal S; Virk MA; Momeni M; Krishnaiah M; Anand S Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):885-90. PubMed ID: 24902032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a matched case-control study. Gory I; Brown G; Wilson J; Kemp W; Paul E; Roberts SK Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):1230-6. PubMed ID: 24998896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Distribution characteristics and risk factors of colorectal adenomas]. Zhou H; Shen Z; Zhao J; Zhou Z; Xu Y Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 21(6):678-684. PubMed ID: 29968244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection. von Renteln D; Robertson DJ; Bensen S; Pohl H Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Mar; 85(3):574-580. PubMed ID: 27590962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England. Lee TJ; Blanks RG; Rees CJ; Wright KC; Nickerson C; Moss SM; Chilton A; Goddard AF; Patnick J; McNally RJ; Rutter MD Endoscopy; 2013; 45(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23254403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Development and validation of a prediction model for adenoma detection during screening and surveillance colonoscopy with comparison to actual adenoma detection rates. Brand EC; Crook JE; Thomas CS; Siersema PD; Rex DK; Wallace MB PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185560. PubMed ID: 28957445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Adenoma detection rates in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical tests versus direct screening colonoscopies. Wong JCT; Chiu HM; Kim HS; Byeon JS; Matsuda T; Kobayashi N; Wu DC; Ong DE; Sung JJY; Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):607-613.e1. PubMed ID: 30452915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas. Coe SG; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):219-26; quiz 227. PubMed ID: 23295274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study. Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]