These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27822149)

  • 1. Increasing number of databases searched in systematic reviews and meta-analyses between 1994 and 2014.
    Lam MT; McDiarmid M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 27822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews.
    Vassar M; Carr B; Kash-Holley M; DeWitt E; Koller C; Day J; Day K; Herrmann D; Holzmann M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Oct; 103(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 26512217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
    Royle P; Waugh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
    Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
    French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
    Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveying the traumatic stress literature: the effective use of bibliographic databases in preparing reviews and meta-analyses.
    Lerner F; Hamblen JL
    J Trauma Stress; 2010 Dec; 23(6):819-22. PubMed ID: 20979218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quality analysis of literature retrievals of systematic reviews for traditional Chinese medicine.
    Chen M; Xiao Y; Liu Y; Peng Y; He J; Zhang Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 25822779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
    Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews.
    Moher D; Tsertsvadze A; Tricco AC; Eccles M; Grimshaw J; Sampson M; Barrowman N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 60(11):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 17938050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture.
    Liu Y; Zhang R; Huang J; Zhao X; Liu D; Sun W; Mai Y; Zhang P; Wang Y; Cao H; Yang Kh
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113172. PubMed ID: 25397774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.
    Whiting P; Westwood M; Burke M; Sterne J; Glanville J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 18313560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence.
    Royle P; Bain L; Waugh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jan; 5():2. PubMed ID: 15638944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in maternal medicine.
    Sheikh L; Johnston S; Thangaratinam S; Kilby MD; Khan KS
    BMC Med; 2007 May; 5():10. PubMed ID: 17524137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.
    Vassar M; Yerokhin V; Sinnett PM; Weiher M; Muckelrath H; Carr B; Varney L; Cook G
    Health Info Libr J; 2017 Jun; 34(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 28383159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.