274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27822165)
1. Equal authorship for equal authors: personal experience as an equal author in twenty peer-reviewed medical publications during the last three years.
Cappell MS
J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):363-364. PubMed ID: 27822165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Author Modifications of Accepted Manuscripts and Galley Proofs: Sharing of Ideas on the Issue.
Wiwanitkit V
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):W59. PubMed ID: 27809559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On peer review.
Schuklenk U
Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. You're a published author!
Wachs JE; Williamson G; Moore PV; Roy D; Childre F
AAOHN J; 2010 Jun; 58(6):233-6. PubMed ID: 20677718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors.
Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J
Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
Algase DL
Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The manuscript review process.
Triadafilopoulos G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Authorship policy of the Journal of Korean Medical Science.
Hong ST
J Korean Med Sci; 2010 May; 25(5):657. PubMed ID: 20436697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of differences between peer reviewers suggested by authors and by editors.
Cummings P
JAMA; 2006 Sep; 296(10):1231; author reply 1231-2. PubMed ID: 16968843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editors and authors: two halves of a whole.
Borus JF
Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Apr; 38(2):224-5. PubMed ID: 24477900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities?
Kramer MS
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review: a view based on recent experience as an author and reviewer.
Clark RK
Br Dent J; 2012 Aug; 213(4):153-4. PubMed ID: 22918342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
Clarke SP
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Footnotes, acknowledgments, and authorship: toward greater responsibility, accountability, and transparency.
Liesegang TJ; Bartley GB
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 158(6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 25457700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nature: the truth.
Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7699):5. PubMed ID: 29620737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What we owe the author: rethinking editorial peer review.
Crigger NJ
Nurs Ethics; 1998 Sep; 5(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 9782929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Gerasimov AN; Kostyukova EI; Kitas GD
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1545-52. PubMed ID: 26538996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
