536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27824487)
1. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 27824487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models: Quantitative biomarkers for differentiating renal clear cell carcinoma and minimal fat angiomyolipoma.
Li H; Liang L; Li A; Hu Y; Hu D; Li Z; Kamel IR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):240-247. PubMed ID: 27859853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive Value of Chemical-Shift MRI in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma.
Jhaveri KS; Elmi A; Hosseini-Nik H; Hedgire S; Evans A; Jewett M; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):W79-86. PubMed ID: 26102422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI evaluation of small (<4cm) solid renal masses: multivariate modeling improves diagnostic accuracy for angiomyolipoma without visible fat compared to univariate analysis.
Schieda N; Dilauro M; Moosavi B; Hodgdon T; Cron GO; McInnes MD; Flood TA
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2242-51. PubMed ID: 26486936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subtype Differentiation of Small (≤ 4 cm) Solid Renal Mass Using Volumetric Histogram Analysis of DWI at 3-T MRI.
Li A; Xing W; Li H; Hu Y; Hu D; Li Z; Kamel IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):614-623. PubMed ID: 29812980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unenhanced CT and MRI Parameters That Can Be Used to Reliably Predict Fat-Invisible Angiomyolipoma.
Jeong CJ; Park BK; Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26797361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Non-contrast Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Jomoto W; Takaki H; Yamamoto S; Kanematsu A; Igeta M; Hirota S; Yamakado K
In Vivo; 2022; 36(6):2790-2799. PubMed ID: 36309367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small (<4 cm) renal mass: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma utilizing MR imaging.
Sasiwimonphan K; Takahashi N; Leibovich BC; Carter RE; Atwell TD; Kawashima A
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22344404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of T1-Weighted MRI to Detect Intratumoral Hemorrhage Within Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma as a Feature Differentiating From Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat.
Murray CA; Quon M; McInnes MD; van der Pol CB; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Sep; 207(3):585-91. PubMed ID: 27275530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential Model of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing between Common Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma.
Ding Y; Zeng M; Rao S; Chen C; Fu C; Zhou J
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(6):853-863. PubMed ID: 27833401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity ratio curve analysis of small renal masses on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Moriyama S; Yoshida S; Tanaka H; Tanaka H; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 29577440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Differentiation of Minimal Fat Angiomyolipoma from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Li H; Li A; Zhu H; Hu Y; Li J; Xia L; Hu D; Kamel IR; Li Z
Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):632-639. PubMed ID: 30087067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques?
Hindman N; Ngo L; Genega EM; Melamed J; Wei J; Braza JM; Rofsky NM; Pedrosa I
Radiology; 2012 Nov; 265(2):468-77. PubMed ID: 23012463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric MRI of solid renal masses: pearls and pitfalls.
Ramamurthy NK; Moosavi B; McInnes MD; Flood TA; Schieda N
Clin Radiol; 2015 Mar; 70(3):304-16. PubMed ID: 25472466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fat poor angiomyolipoma differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion.
Chen C; Kang Q; Xu B; Shi Z; Guo H; Wei Q; Lu Y; Wu X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 28828638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma.
Schieda N; Hodgdon T; El-Khodary M; Flood TA; McInnes MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25415700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
