These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27824487)
1. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma. Park JJ; Kim CK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 27824487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma. Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models: Quantitative biomarkers for differentiating renal clear cell carcinoma and minimal fat angiomyolipoma. Li H; Liang L; Li A; Hu Y; Hu D; Li Z; Kamel IR J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):240-247. PubMed ID: 27859853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive Value of Chemical-Shift MRI in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma. Jhaveri KS; Elmi A; Hosseini-Nik H; Hedgire S; Evans A; Jewett M; Harisinghani M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):W79-86. PubMed ID: 26102422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI evaluation of small (<4cm) solid renal masses: multivariate modeling improves diagnostic accuracy for angiomyolipoma without visible fat compared to univariate analysis. Schieda N; Dilauro M; Moosavi B; Hodgdon T; Cron GO; McInnes MD; Flood TA Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2242-51. PubMed ID: 26486936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subtype Differentiation of Small (≤ 4 cm) Solid Renal Mass Using Volumetric Histogram Analysis of DWI at 3-T MRI. Li A; Xing W; Li H; Hu Y; Hu D; Li Z; Kamel IR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):614-623. PubMed ID: 29812980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT. Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unenhanced CT and MRI Parameters That Can Be Used to Reliably Predict Fat-Invisible Angiomyolipoma. Jeong CJ; Park BK; Park JJ; Kim CK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26797361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Non-contrast Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Jomoto W; Takaki H; Yamamoto S; Kanematsu A; Igeta M; Hirota S; Yamakado K In Vivo; 2022; 36(6):2790-2799. PubMed ID: 36309367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small (<4 cm) renal mass: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma utilizing MR imaging. Sasiwimonphan K; Takahashi N; Leibovich BC; Carter RE; Atwell TD; Kawashima A Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22344404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of T1-Weighted MRI to Detect Intratumoral Hemorrhage Within Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma as a Feature Differentiating From Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat. Murray CA; Quon M; McInnes MD; van der Pol CB; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Sep; 207(3):585-91. PubMed ID: 27275530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential Model of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing between Common Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma. Ding Y; Zeng M; Rao S; Chen C; Fu C; Zhou J Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(6):853-863. PubMed ID: 27833401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity ratio curve analysis of small renal masses on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma. Moriyama S; Yoshida S; Tanaka H; Tanaka H; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 29577440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Differentiation of Minimal Fat Angiomyolipoma from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Li H; Li A; Zhu H; Hu Y; Li J; Xia L; Hu D; Kamel IR; Li Z Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):632-639. PubMed ID: 30087067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Hindman N; Ngo L; Genega EM; Melamed J; Wei J; Braza JM; Rofsky NM; Pedrosa I Radiology; 2012 Nov; 265(2):468-77. PubMed ID: 23012463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]