145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27824745)
1. Regeneration Process After Cervical Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Song T; Seong SJ; Kim BG
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 27824745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regeneration of uterine cervix at 6 months after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):678-84. PubMed ID: 22313794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of age and cone dimensions on cervical regeneration: an Italian multicentric prospective observational study.
Ciavattini A; Delli Carpini G; Moriconi L; Clemente N; Montik N; De Vincenzo R; Del Fabro A; Buttignol M; Ricci C; Moro F; Sopracordevole F
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020675. PubMed ID: 29555794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound evaluation of cervical regeneration after LLETZ for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a prospective observational study.
Nicolas F; Robert AL; Lavoué V; Henno S; Tavenard A; Laviolle B; Levêque J
Anticancer Res; 2014 Jul; 34(7):3799-805. PubMed ID: 24982405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proportion of excision and cervical healing after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Founta C; Arbyn M; Valasoulis G; Kyrgiou M; Tsili A; Martin-Hirsch P; Dalkalitsis N; Karakitsos P; Kassanos D; Prendiville W; Loufopoulos A; Paraskevaidis E
BJOG; 2010 Nov; 117(12):1468-74. PubMed ID: 20840527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D ultrasound as a surgical quality control of conization in patients with severe dysplasia: a prospective study.
Dückelmann AM; Wordell J; Richter R; Sehouli J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Nov; 302(5):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 32740870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia positive cutting edge after conization].
Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 29(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 17645859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The problems of cervical conization for postmenopausal patients.
Hasegawa K; Torii Y; Kato R; Udagawa Y; Fukasawa I
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016; 37(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 27352558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ultrasonographic evaluation of the uterine cervix length remaining after LOOP-excision].
Robert AL; Nicolas F; Lavoué V; Henno S; Mesbah H; Porée P; Levêque J
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2014 Apr; 43(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 23623518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image assessment of cervical dimensions after LLETZ: a prospective observational study.
Carcopino X; Maycock JA; Mancini J; Jeffers M; Farrar K; Martin M; Khalid S; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 23228032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cone measurements and residual disease in LLETZ conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Antonakou A; Sindos M; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Sakellaropoulos G; Antsaklis A
In Vivo; 2011; 25(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 21709016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.
Montanari E; Grimm C; Schwameis R; Kuessel L; Polterauer S; Paternostro C; Husslein H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 29602979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laser conization: the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Andersen ES; Pedersen B; Nielsen K
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8063246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Hutchens D
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16394037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
