145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27824745)
21. Cervical regeneration after diathermy excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as assessed by transvaginal sonography.
Paraskevaidis E; Bilirakis E; Koliopoulos G; Lolis ED; Kalantaridou S; Paschopoulos M; Plachouras N; Malamou-Mitsi V; Kitchener HC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2002 Apr; 102(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 12039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Increase in the cervical length after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Akashi K; Suzuki Y; Konno R; Motomatsu S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 27924675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Conization non in sano].
Lahousen M; Pickel H; Girardi F; Jäger G
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32 Suppl 1():131. PubMed ID: 1286317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse after conization in relation to HPV vaccination status.
Sand FL; Kjaer SK; Frederiksen K; Dehlendorff C
Int J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 147(3):641-647. PubMed ID: 31648368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of cervical length and optimal timing for pregnancy after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective study.
Zhang X; Tong J; Ma X; Yu H; Guan X; Li J; Yang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(49):e23411. PubMed ID: 33285731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Clinical analysis of the effect of cervical conization on fertility and pregnancy outcome].
He HJ; Pan LY; Huang HF; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 42(8):515-7. PubMed ID: 17983487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Diagnosis and treatment of grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by cervical conization in 98 patients].
Chen W; Guan T
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1642-4, 1647. PubMed ID: 20650790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical conization--treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma in situ.
Perisic Z; Perisic M; Karapandzic VP; Vasiljevic M; Raznatovic SJ; Jurisic A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2011; 32(5):534-7. PubMed ID: 22053669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk factors for human papillomavirus persistence among women undergoing cold-knife conization for treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Togrul C; Caglar M; Gungor T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 24726620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk of preterm delivery associated with prior treatment of cervical precancerous lesion according to the depth of the cone.
Berretta R; Gizzo S; Dall'Asta A; Mazzone E; Monica M; Franchi L; Peri F; Patrelli TS; Bacchi Modena A
Dis Markers; 2013; 35(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 24324288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Milojkovic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Kawano K; Tsuda N; Nishio S; Yonemoto K; Tasaki K; Tasaki R; Ushijima K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Sep; 27(5):e54. PubMed ID: 27401478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is followed by disappearance of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid and a decline in serum and cervical mucus antibodies against human papillomavirus antigens.
Elfgren K; Bistoletti P; Dillner L; Walboomers JM; Meijer CJ; Dillner J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 174(3):937-42. PubMed ID: 8633673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Current conservative surgery in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Zarcone R; Bellini P; Cardone G; Raucci F; Mancino T; Voto RI
Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Sep; 46(9):451-4. PubMed ID: 7984322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
