BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27824755)

  • 1. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Conversion to Laparotomy of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecology.
    Lim CS; Mowers EL; Mahnert N; Skinner BD; Kamdar N; Morgan DM; As-Sanie S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1295-1305. PubMed ID: 27824755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
    Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk factors for robotic gynecologic procedures requiring conversion to other surgical procedures.
    Unger CA; Lachiewicz MP; Ridgeway B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Dec; 135(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27591050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
    Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of complication at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prediction model built from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Pepin KJ; Cook EF; Cohen SL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 223(4):555.e1-555.e7. PubMed ID: 32247844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a multicenter analysis using the national surgical quality improvement program data.
    Mahdi H; Goodrich S; Lockhart D; DeBernardo R; Moslemi-Kebria M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):901-9. PubMed ID: 24768957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of 30-day readmission following hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at a tertiary care academic medical center.
    Lee MS; Venkatesh KK; Growdon WB; Ecker JL; York-Best CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):607.e1-607.e12. PubMed ID: 26704895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical volume and conversion rate in laparoscopic hysterectomy: does volume matter? A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
    Keurentjes JHM; Briët JM; de Bock GH; Mourits MJE
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):1021-1026. PubMed ID: 28842767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Importance of Estimated Blood Loss in Resource Utilization and Complications of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
    English EM; Bell S; Kamdar NS; Swenson CW; Wiese H; Morgan DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):650-657. PubMed ID: 30870284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications.
    Cusimano MC; Simpson AN; Dossa F; Liani V; Kaur Y; Acuna SA; Robertson D; Satkunaratnam A; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Baxter NN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):410-428.e19. PubMed ID: 31082383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Conversion to Open Surgery in Benign Gynecologic Laparoscopies: A Case-Control Study.
    Richards L; Healey M; Cheng C; Reddington C; Robson-Hamond C; Dior U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 33892186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk Factors for Bowel Injury in Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
    Zhu CR; Mallick R; Singh SS; Auer R; Solnik J; Choudhry AJ; Chen I
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 32925612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
    Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
    Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of bowel preparation does not reduce postoperative infectious morbidity following minimally invasive or open hysterectomies.
    Kalogera E; Van Houten HK; Sangaralingham LR; Borah BJ; Dowdy SC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):231.e1-231.e12. PubMed ID: 32112733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Risk Factors for Unplanned Conversion from Laparoscopic and Robotic to Open Colorectal Surgery Using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) Database.
    Bhama AR; Wafa AM; Ferraro J; Collins SD; Mullard AJ; Vandewarker JF; Krapohl G; Byrn JC; Cleary RK
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Jun; 20(6):1223-30. PubMed ID: 26847352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.