These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27824755)

  • 1. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Conversion to Laparotomy of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecology.
    Lim CS; Mowers EL; Mahnert N; Skinner BD; Kamdar N; Morgan DM; As-Sanie S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1295-1305. PubMed ID: 27824755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
    Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk factors for robotic gynecologic procedures requiring conversion to other surgical procedures.
    Unger CA; Lachiewicz MP; Ridgeway B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Dec; 135(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27591050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
    Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of complication at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prediction model built from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Pepin KJ; Cook EF; Cohen SL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 223(4):555.e1-555.e7. PubMed ID: 32247844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a multicenter analysis using the national surgical quality improvement program data.
    Mahdi H; Goodrich S; Lockhart D; DeBernardo R; Moslemi-Kebria M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):901-9. PubMed ID: 24768957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of 30-day readmission following hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at a tertiary care academic medical center.
    Lee MS; Venkatesh KK; Growdon WB; Ecker JL; York-Best CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):607.e1-607.e12. PubMed ID: 26704895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical volume and conversion rate in laparoscopic hysterectomy: does volume matter? A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
    Keurentjes JHM; Briët JM; de Bock GH; Mourits MJE
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):1021-1026. PubMed ID: 28842767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Importance of Estimated Blood Loss in Resource Utilization and Complications of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
    English EM; Bell S; Kamdar NS; Swenson CW; Wiese H; Morgan DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):650-657. PubMed ID: 30870284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications.
    Cusimano MC; Simpson AN; Dossa F; Liani V; Kaur Y; Acuna SA; Robertson D; Satkunaratnam A; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Baxter NN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):410-428.e19. PubMed ID: 31082383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Conversion to Open Surgery in Benign Gynecologic Laparoscopies: A Case-Control Study.
    Richards L; Healey M; Cheng C; Reddington C; Robson-Hamond C; Dior U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 33892186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk Factors for Bowel Injury in Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
    Zhu CR; Mallick R; Singh SS; Auer R; Solnik J; Choudhry AJ; Chen I
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 32925612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
    Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
    Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of bowel preparation does not reduce postoperative infectious morbidity following minimally invasive or open hysterectomies.
    Kalogera E; Van Houten HK; Sangaralingham LR; Borah BJ; Dowdy SC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):231.e1-231.e12. PubMed ID: 32112733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Risk Factors for Unplanned Conversion from Laparoscopic and Robotic to Open Colorectal Surgery Using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) Database.
    Bhama AR; Wafa AM; Ferraro J; Collins SD; Mullard AJ; Vandewarker JF; Krapohl G; Byrn JC; Cleary RK
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Jun; 20(6):1223-30. PubMed ID: 26847352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.