These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27825601)

  • 1. A comparison of kinematic-based gait event detection methods in a self-paced treadmill application.
    Hendershot BD; Mahon CE; Pruziner AL
    J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):4146-4149. PubMed ID: 27825601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel velocity estimation for symmetric and asymmetric self-paced treadmill training.
    Canete S; Jacobs DA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 18(1):27. PubMed ID: 33546729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic identification of gait events during walking on uneven surfaces.
    Eckardt N; Kibele A
    Gait Posture; 2017 Feb; 52():83-86. PubMed ID: 27888695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three kinematic gait event detection methods during overground and treadmill walking for individuals post stroke.
    French MA; Koller C; Arch ES
    J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 99():109481. PubMed ID: 31718818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated event detection algorithms in pathological gait.
    Bruening DA; Ridge ST
    Gait Posture; 2014; 39(1):472-7. PubMed ID: 24041468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Five Kinematic-Based Identification Methods of Foot Contact Events During Treadmill Walking and Running at Different Speeds.
    Alvim F; Cerqueira L; Netto AD; Leite G; Muniz A
    J Appl Biomech; 2015 Oct; 31(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 25950421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data.
    Zeni JA; Richards JG; Higginson JS
    Gait Posture; 2008 May; 27(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 17723303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between kinematic and ground reaction force techniques for determining gait events during treadmill walking at different walking speeds.
    Kiss RM
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jul; 32(6):662-7. PubMed ID: 20226713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of toe-off event time during treadmill locomotion using kinematic data.
    De Witt JK
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):3067-9. PubMed ID: 20801452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-paced and fixed speed treadmill walking yield similar energetics and biomechanics across different speeds.
    Theunissen K; Van Hooren B; Plasqui G; Meijer K
    Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():2-7. PubMed ID: 34801952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A kinematic algorithm to identify gait events during running at different speeds and with different footstrike types.
    Handsaker JC; Forrester SE; Folland JP; Black MI; Allen SJ
    J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):4128-4133. PubMed ID: 27814970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time kinematic-based detection of foot-strike during walking.
    Karakasis C; Artemiadis P
    J Biomech; 2021 Dec; 129():110849. PubMed ID: 34800744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and validation of FootNet; a new kinematic algorithm to improve foot-strike and toe-off detection in treadmill running.
    Rivadulla A; Chen X; Weir G; Cazzola D; Trewartha G; Hamill J; Preatoni E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0248608. PubMed ID: 34370747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using force data to self-pace an instrumented treadmill and measure self-selected walking speed.
    Song S; Choi H; Collins SH
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 17(1):68. PubMed ID: 32493426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fixed and self-paced treadmill walking for able-bodied and transtibial amputees in a multi-terrain virtual environment.
    Sinitski EH; Lemaire ED; Baddour N; Besemann M; Dudek NL; Hebert JS
    Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):568-73. PubMed ID: 25661003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of an IMU-based foot-ground contact detection (FGCD) algorithm.
    Kim M; Lee D
    Ergonomics; 2017 Mar; 60(3):384-403. PubMed ID: 27068742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals.
    Ghoussayni S; Stevens C; Durham S; Ewins D
    Gait Posture; 2004 Dec; 20(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 15531173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speed-related but not detrended gait variability increases with more sensitive self-paced treadmill controllers at multiple slopes.
    Castano CR; Huang HJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251229. PubMed ID: 33961654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects.
    Riley PO; Paolini G; Della Croce U; Paylo KW; Kerrigan DC
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jun; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 16905322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel kinematic detection of foot-strike and toe-off events during noninstrumented treadmill running to estimate contact time.
    Patoz A; Lussiana T; Gindre C; Malatesta D
    J Biomech; 2021 Nov; 128():110737. PubMed ID: 34517256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.