207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27825987)
1. Safety assessment of Bacillus subtilis CU1 for use as a probiotic in humans.
Lefevre M; Racedo SM; Denayrolles M; Ripert G; Desfougères T; Lobach AR; Simon R; Pélerin F; Jüsten P; Urdaci MC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 83():54-65. PubMed ID: 27825987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety evaluation of two bacterial strains used in Asian probiotic products.
Tompkins TA; Hagen KE; Wallace TD; Fillion-Forté V
Can J Microbiol; 2008 May; 54(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 18449224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis R0179 on gastrointestinal viability and general wellness: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in healthy adults.
Hanifi A; Culpepper T; Mai V; Anand A; Ford AL; Ukhanova M; Christman M; Tompkins TA; Dahl WJ
Benef Microbes; 2015 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 25062611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of two Bacillus probiotics.
Green DH; Wakeley PR; Page A; Barnes A; Baccigalupi L; Ricca E; Cutting SM
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1999 Sep; 65(9):4288-91. PubMed ID: 10473456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Probiotic strain Bacillus subtilis CU1 stimulates immune system of elderly during common infectious disease period: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Lefevre M; Racedo SM; Ripert G; Housez B; Cazaubiel M; Maudet C; Jüsten P; Marteau P; Urdaci MC
Immun Ageing; 2015; 12():24. PubMed ID: 26640504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro evaluation of candidate Bacillus spp. for animal feed.
Mingmongkolchai S; Panbangred W
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2017 May; 63(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 28331163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isolation and characterization of Bacillus subtilis CH16 strain from chicken gastrointestinal tracts for use as a feed supplement to promote weight gain in broilers.
Nguyen AT; Nguyen DV; Tran MT; Nguyen LT; Nguyen AH; Phan TN
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2015 Jun; 60(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 25754534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The safety of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus indicus as food probiotics.
Hong HA; Huang JM; Khaneja R; Hiep LV; Urdaci MC; Cutting SM
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 105(2):510-20. PubMed ID: 18312567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety of a probiotic cheese containing Lactobacillus plantarum Tensia according to a variety of health indices in different age groups.
Songisepp E; Hütt P; Rätsep M; Shkut E; Kõljalg S; Truusalu K; Stsepetova J; Smidt I; Kolk H; Zagura M; Mikelsaar M
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Oct; 95(10):5495-509. PubMed ID: 22863096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First certified reference materials for molecular fingerprinting of two approved probiotic Bacillus strains.
De Baets L; Van Iwaarden P; Meeus N; Schimmel H; Philipp W; Emons H
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Jan; 129(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 19062121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of Bacillus spp. strains for use as probiotic additives in pig feed.
Larsen N; Thorsen L; Kpikpi EN; Stuer-Lauridsen B; Cantor MD; Nielsen B; Brockmann E; Derkx PM; Jespersen L
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Feb; 98(3):1105-18. PubMed ID: 24201893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs.
Guo X; Li D; Lu W; Piao X; Chen X
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2006 Aug; 90(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 16820971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship of Bacillus subtilis clades associated with strains 168 and W23: a proposal for Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis subsp. nov. and Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii subsp. nov.
Nakamura LK; Roberts MS; Cohan FM
Int J Syst Bacteriol; 1999 Jul; 49 Pt 3():1211-5. PubMed ID: 10425781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A study of the safety of probiotic bacilli].
Sorokulova IB; Osipova IG; Tereshkina NV; Vasil'eva EA; Budanova EV
Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2006; (1):50-4. PubMed ID: 16496957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genotypic and phenotypic differentiation of an antifungal biocontrol strain belonging to Bacillus subtilis.
Marten P; Smalla K; Berg G
J Appl Microbiol; 2000 Sep; 89(3):463-71. PubMed ID: 11021578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phylogeny and molecular taxonomy of the Bacillus subtilis species complex and description of Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum subsp. nov.
Rooney AP; Price NP; Ehrhardt C; Swezey JL; Bannan JD
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2009 Oct; 59(Pt 10):2429-36. PubMed ID: 19622642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. phoR sequences as a phylogenetic marker to differentiate the species in the Bacillus subtilis group.
Guo Q; Li S; Lu X; Li B; Stummer B; Dong W; Ma P
Can J Microbiol; 2012 Nov; 58(11):1295-305. PubMed ID: 23145827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety Assessment of
Spears JL; Kramer R; Nikiforov AI; Rihner MO; Lambert EA
Nutrients; 2021 Feb; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33668992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis strains as probiotics and their potential as a food ingredient.
Permpoonpattana P; Hong HA; Khaneja R; Cutting SM
Benef Microbes; 2012 Jun; 3(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 22433662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antibacterial activity and genotypic-phenotypic characteristics of bacteriocin-producing Bacillus subtilis KKU213: potential as a probiotic strain.
Khochamit N; Siripornadulsil S; Sukon P; Siripornadulsil W
Microbiol Res; 2015 Jan; 170():36-50. PubMed ID: 25440998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
