These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27826316)

  • 1. LTDNA Evidence on Trial.
    Roberts P
    Front Genet; 2016; 7():180. PubMed ID: 27826316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paradigms of forensic science and legal process: a critical diagnosis.
    Roberts P
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
    Krauss DA; Scurich N
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23613165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Renegotiating forensic cultures: between law, science and criminal justice.
    Roberts P
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 23022585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Criminal profiling as expert witness evidence: The implications of the profiler validity research.
    Kocsis RN; Palermo GB
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):55-65. PubMed ID: 27340115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lessons from Canadian Courts for All Expert Witnesses.
    Booth BD; Watts J; Dufour M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Aug; 47(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 31097525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heterodoxy, iconoclasm and spuriousness: the limits of novel expert evidence.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):323-36. PubMed ID: 18251417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Demonstrating reliability through transparency: A scientific validity framework to assist scientists and lawyers in criminal proceedings.
    Carr S; Piasecki E; Gallop A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110110. PubMed ID: 31959481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the present: expert testimony and civil commitment.
    Schopp RF; Quattrocchi MR
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):159-81. PubMed ID: 10150376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings.
    Tyshchenko OI; Leiba OA; Titko IA
    Wiad Lek; 2019; 72(12 cz 2):2445-2450. PubMed ID: 32124767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
    Faigman DL; Monahan J
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mild traumatic brain injury: Is DTI ready for the courtroom?
    Shenton ME; Price BH; Levin L; Edersheim JG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 61():50-63. PubMed ID: 30391039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Blowed off by a side wind"? Coronial inquests following criminal acquittals.
    Aberdeen J
    J Law Med; 2016 Mar; 23(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 27323637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.