These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27826385)

  • 1. Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form.
    Park JM
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2016 Oct; 8(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 27826385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
    Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
    Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trueness of intraoral scanners in digitizing specific locations at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations.
    Jin-Young Kim R; Benic GI; Park JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 33176925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
    Osman RB; Alharbi NM
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trueness and Precision of Four Intraoral Scanners in Oral Implantology: A Comparative in Vitro Study.
    Mangano FG; Veronesi G; Hauschild U; Mijiritsky E; Mangano C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163107. PubMed ID: 27684723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience.
    Lim JH; Park JM; Kim M; Heo SJ; Myung JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 28689906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of scan extension and starting quadrant on the accuracy of four intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported crowns.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38641480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
    Elter B; Tak Ö
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full-arch accuracy of five intraoral scanners:
    Kwon M; Cho Y; Kim DW; Kim M; Kim YJ; Chang M
    Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 33678625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Preparation Type and Tooth Geometry on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners.
    Ashraf Y; Sabet A; Hamdy A; Ebeid K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):800-804. PubMed ID: 32406156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.
    Revilla-León M; Fernández-Estevan L; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In Vitro Trueness and Precision of Intraoral Scanners in a Four-Implant Complete-Arch Model.
    Spagopoulos D; Kaisarlis G; Spagopoulou F; Halazonetis DJ; Güth JF; Papazoglou E
    Dent J (Basel); 2023 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 36661564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 12(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 33149851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of trueness between conventional and digital impression in dental-supported fixed dental prosthesis with vertical preparation.
    García-Gil I; Perez de la Calle C; Lopez-Suarez C; Pontevedra P; Suarez MJ
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 Sep; 12(9):e896-e901. PubMed ID: 32994882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trueness and Precision of Three-Dimensional Digitizing Intraoral Devices.
    Mutwalli H; Braian M; Mahmood D; Larsson C
    Int J Dent; 2018; 2018():5189761. PubMed ID: 30598665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.