These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches. Weksler B; Sullivan JL Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-incision laparo-thoracoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy to treat oesophageal cancer†. Lee JM; Yang SM; Yang PW; Huang PM Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():i59-63. PubMed ID: 26547093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center. Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis. Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study. Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches. Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown. Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan. Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Single Intercostal Space Thoracoscopic Approach for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy. Pan S; Wang L; Wu M; Wang Q; Shen G; Chen G J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 28504587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS. Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]