BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27829375)

  • 41. Direct and correlated responses to selection for yearling weight on reproductive performance of Nelore cows.
    Mercadante ME; Packer IU; Razook AG; Cyrillo JN; Figueiredo LA
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Feb; 81(2):376-84. PubMed ID: 12643480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Joint Alpharma-Beef Species Symposium: interactions of feed efficiency with beef heifer reproductive development.
    Randel RD; Welsh TH
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Mar; 91(3):1323-8. PubMed ID: 23048157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The influence of genetic selection and feed system on the reproductive performance of spring-calving dairy cows within future pasture-based production systems.
    Coleman J; Pierce KM; Berry DP; Brennan A; Horan B
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 19762844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Alpharma Beef Cattle Nutrition Symposium: predictability of feedlot cattle growth performance.
    Galyean ML; DiLorenzo N; McMeniman JP; Defoor PJ
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jun; 89(6):1865-72. PubMed ID: 20833765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of single or multiple sires and serving capacity on mating behavior of beef bulls.
    Godfrey RW; Lunstra DD
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Nov; 67(11):2897-903. PubMed ID: 2592279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Genetic associations between age at first calving and heifer body weight and scrotal circumference in Nelore cattle.
    Grossi DA; Venturini GC; Paz CC; Bezerra LA; Lôbo RB; Oliveira JA; Munari DP
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Oct; 126(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 19765165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fertility of yearling beef bulls during mating.
    Ellis RW; Rupp GP; Chenoweth PJ; Cundiff LV; Lunstra DD
    Theriogenology; 2005 Aug; 64(3):657-78. PubMed ID: 15961148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Genetic parameter estimates for bull prolificacy and its relationship with scrotal circumference in a commercial beef cattle population.
    Russell CA; Pollak EJ; Spangler ML
    Transl Anim Sci; 2021 Jul; 5(3):txab128. PubMed ID: 34414358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values.
    Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2093-102. PubMed ID: 18441073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Some nutritional and genetic considerations in the performance testing of beef bulls.
    Cates WF
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 1991 Mar; 7(1):59-76. PubMed ID: 2049671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. To what extent does the composition of batches formed at the sorting facility influence the subsequent growth performance of young beef bulls? A French observational study.
    Herve L; Bareille N; Cornette B; Loiseau P; Assié S
    Prev Vet Med; 2020 Mar; 176():104936. PubMed ID: 32109779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Two-trait random regression model to estimate the genetic association of scrotal circumference with female reproductive performance in Nelore cattle.
    Santana ML; Eler JP; Bignardi AB; Ferraz JB
    Theriogenology; 2015 Jun; 83(9):1534-40. PubMed ID: 25747195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Increase in average testis size of Canadian beef bulls.
    García Guerra A; Hendrick S; Barth AD
    Can Vet J; 2013 May; 54(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 24155433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of three methods for adjusting scrotal circumference in Charolais, Limousin and Hungarian Fleckvieh young bulls under farm conditions.
    Tózsér J; Mézes M
    Acta Vet Hung; 1999; 47(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 10213927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Across-sex genomic-assisted genetic correlations for sex-influenced traits in Brahman cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):41. PubMed ID: 31337334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Crossbred bull selection for bigger scrotum and shorter age at puberty with potentials for better quality semen.
    Siddiqui MA; Bhattacharjee J; Das ZC; Islam MM; Islam MA; Haque MA; Parrish JJ; Shamsuddin M
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Feb; 43(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 18199262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimates of covariances between reproduction and growth in Australian beef cattle.
    Meyer K; Hammond K; Mackinnon MJ; Parnell PF
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Sep; 69(9):3533-43. PubMed ID: 1938640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluating the reproductive performance of British beef and dairy herds using national cattle movement records.
    Gates MC
    Vet Rec; 2013 Nov; 173(20):499. PubMed ID: 23926171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Genome-wide association for heifer reproduction and calf performance traits in beef cattle.
    Akanno EC; Plastow G; Fitzsimmons C; Miller SP; Baron V; Ominski K; Basarab JA
    Genome; 2015 Dec; 58(12):549-57. PubMed ID: 26484575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.