These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27829624)

  • 1. Finite Element Analysis on Nanomechanical Sensing of Cellular Forces.
    Imamura G; Shiba K; Yoshikawa G
    Anal Sci; 2016; 32(11):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 27829624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite Element Analysis on Nanomechanical Detection of Small Particles: Toward Virus Detection.
    Imamura G; Shiba K; Yoshikawa G
    Front Microbiol; 2016; 7():488. PubMed ID: 27148181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite Element Analysis of Interface Dependence on Nanomechanical Sensing.
    Minami K; Yoshikawa G
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 32164172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-side-coated nanomechanical membrane-type surface stress sensor (MSS) for one-chip-one-channel setup.
    Yoshikawa G; Loizeau F; Lee CJ; Akiyama T; Shiba K; Gautsch S; Nakayama T; Vettiger P; de Rooij NF; Aono M
    Langmuir; 2013 Jun; 29(24):7551-6. PubMed ID: 23742183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of coating materials on two dimensional stress-induced deflection of nanomechanical sensors.
    Yoshikawa G; Lee CJ; Shiba K
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2014 Apr; 14(4):2908-12. PubMed ID: 24734709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nanomechanical sensors for single microbial cell growth monitoring.
    Maloney N; Lukacs G; Jensen J; Hegner M
    Nanoscale; 2014 Jul; 6(14):8242-9. PubMed ID: 24931547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biosensors based on nanomechanical systems.
    Tamayo J; Kosaka PM; Ruz JJ; San Paulo Á; Calleja M
    Chem Soc Rev; 2013 Feb; 42(3):1287-311. PubMed ID: 23152052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nanomechanical membrane-type surface stress sensor.
    Yoshikawa G; Akiyama T; Gautsch S; Vettiger P; Rohrer H
    Nano Lett; 2011 Mar; 11(3):1044-8. PubMed ID: 21314159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A meta-model analysis of a finite element simulation for defining poroelastic properties of intervertebral discs.
    Nikkhoo M; Hsu YC; Haghpanahi M; Parnianpour M; Wang JL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jun; 227(6):672-82. PubMed ID: 23636748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element analysis of imposing femtonewton forces with micropipette aspiration.
    Shao JY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 30(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 12086005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear finite element simulations of injuries with free boundaries: application to surgical wounds.
    Valero C; Javierre E; García-Aznar JM; Gómez-Benito MJ
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Jun; 30(6):616-33. PubMed ID: 24443355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nanomechanical cantilever sensors as a novel tool for real-time monitoring and characterization of surface layer formation.
    Koeser J; Bammerlin M; Battiston FM; Hubler U
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2010 Apr; 10(4):2578-82. PubMed ID: 20355466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probing cellular traction forces by micropillar arrays: contribution of substrate warping to pillar deflection.
    Schoen I; Hu W; Klotzsch E; Vogel V
    Nano Lett; 2010 May; 10(5):1823-30. PubMed ID: 20387859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nanomechanical properties of mineralised collagen microfibrils based on finite elements method: biomechanical role of cross-links.
    Barkaoui A; Hambli R
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(14):1590-601. PubMed ID: 23439084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent Advances in Nanomechanical Membrane-Type Surface Stress Sensors towards Artificial Olfaction.
    Minami K; Imamura G; Tamura R; Shiba K; Yoshikawa G
    Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36140147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical properties of normal versus cancerous breast cells.
    Smelser AM; Macosko JC; O'Dell AP; Smyre S; Bonin K; Holzwarth G
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Nov; 14(6):1335-47. PubMed ID: 25929519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-stochastic cell-level computational modelling of cellular forces: application to contractures in burns and cyclic loading.
    Vermolen FJ; Gefen A
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Nov; 14(6):1181-95. PubMed ID: 25776519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structure and mechanical properties of Cresco-Ti laser-welded joints and stress analyses using finite element models of fixed distal extension and fixed partial prosthetic designs.
    Uysal H; Kurtoglu C; Gurbuz R; Tutuncu N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 15775924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nanomechanical characterization of red blood cells using optical tweezers.
    Li C; Liu KK
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 Apr; 19(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 18214643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis.
    Placido E; Meira JB; Lima RG; Muench A; de Souza RM; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1086-92. PubMed ID: 17123595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.