BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27830152)

  • 21. Enhancing speech discrimination through stimulus repetition.
    Holt RF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1431-47. PubMed ID: 21646420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the use of the distortion-sensitivity approach in examining the role of linguistic abilities in speech understanding in noise.
    Goverts ST; Huysmans E; Kramer SE; de Groot AM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1702-8. PubMed ID: 22180022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The benefit of gestures during communication: evidence from hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Obermeier C; Dolk T; Gunter TC
    Cortex; 2012 Jul; 48(7):857-70. PubMed ID: 21397223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of listening condition on background noise acceptance for young adults with normal hearing.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE; Estis JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1356-72. PubMed ID: 22411277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech Recognition in Noise by Younger and Older Adults: Effects of Age, Hearing Loss, and Temporal Resolution.
    Vermeire K; Knoop A; Boel C; Auwers S; Schenus L; Talaveron-Rodriguez M; De Boom C; De Sloovere M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Apr; 125(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 26466858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Procedure learning effects in speech perception tests.
    Theodoridis GC; Schoeny ZG
    Audiology; 1990; 29(4):228-39. PubMed ID: 2222292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dichotic word recognition in noise and the right-ear advantage.
    Roup CM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):292-7. PubMed ID: 20689034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How hearing impairment affects sentence comprehension: using eye fixations to investigate the duration of speech processing.
    Wendt D; Kollmeier B; Brand T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Variability of word discrimination scores in clinical practice and consequences on their sensitivity to hearing loss.
    Moulin A; Bernard A; Tordella L; Vergne J; Gisbert A; Martin C; Richard C
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2117-2124. PubMed ID: 28039514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sentence repetition as a measure of early grammatical development in Italian.
    Devescovi A; Caselli MC
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2007; 42(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 17365093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children's ability to perceive speech in noise.
    Thompson EC; Krizman J; White-Schwoch T; Nicol T; Estabrook R; Kraus N
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 39():100672. PubMed ID: 31430627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss].
    Moreira RR; Ferreira Junior M
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15609584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Aging and speech perception: beyond hearing threshold and cognitive ability.
    Fostick L; Ben-Artzi E; Babkoff H
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2013; 24(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 23950572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults.
    Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 24165300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.