These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27830152)

  • 41. The effects of background noise on dichotic listening to consonant-vowel syllables.
    Dos Santos Sequeira S; Specht K; Hämäläinen H; Hugdahl K
    Brain Lang; 2008 Oct; 107(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18602155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Smulders YE; van Zon A; Stegeman I; Rinia AB; Van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Hendrice N; Free RH; Maat B; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ; Mylanus EA; Huinck WJ; Smit AL; Topsakal V; Tange RA; Grolman W
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 142(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 26796630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Hemispheric specialization for linguistic processing of sung speech.
    Yelle SK; Grimshaw GM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Feb; 108(1):219-28. PubMed ID: 19425463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Development and evaluation of a linguistically and audiologically controlled sentence intelligibility test.
    Uslar VN; Carroll R; Hanke M; Hamann C; Ruigendijk E; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3039-56. PubMed ID: 24116439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sentence repetition: what does the task measure?
    Polišenská K; Chiat S; Roy P
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2015; 50(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 25208477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy.
    Koch DB; Quick A; Osberger MJ; Saoji A; Litvak L
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 24691504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
    Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A test of linguistic influences in the perceptual organization of speech.
    Freggens M; Thomas A; Pitt MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1065-1075. PubMed ID: 30891663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Nonnative English speaker performance on the Basic English Lexicon (BEL) sentences.
    Rimikis S; Smiljanic R; Calandruccio L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):792-804. PubMed ID: 23275396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.
    Anderson Gosselin P; Gagné JP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):944-58. PubMed ID: 21060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Lateralization of linguistic and melodic processing with age.
    Borod JC; Goodglass H
    Neuropsychologia; 1980; 18(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 7366826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity.
    Wingfield A; McCoy SL; Peelle JE; Tun PA; Cox LC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(7):487-97. PubMed ID: 16927513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Relationship Between Domain-Specific Cognitive Function and Speech-in-Noise Performance in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Hearing Pilot Study.
    Mamo SK; Reed NS; Sharrett AR; Albert MS; Coresh J; Mosley TH; Knopman D; Lin FR; Deal JA
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 28(4):1006-1014. PubMed ID: 31825642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Response latencies in auditory sentence comprehension: effects of linguistic versus perceptual challenge.
    Tun PA; Benichov J; Wingfield A
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):730-5. PubMed ID: 20853977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.