290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27830373)
1. Precision of MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: an ex vivo comparison of alternative biopsy techniques on prostate phantoms.
Westhoff N; Siegel FP; Hausmann D; Polednik M; von Hardenberg J; Michel MS; Ritter M
World J Urol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 27830373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion.
Ukimura O; Desai MM; Palmer S; Valencerina S; Gross M; Abreu AL; Aron M; Gill IS
J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):1080-6. PubMed ID: 22266005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Elastic and Rigid Registration during Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Multi-Operator Phantom Study.
Hale GR; Czarniecki M; Cheng A; Bloom JB; Seifabadi R; Gold SA; Rayn KN; Sabarwal VK; Mehralivand S; Choyke PL; Turkbey B; Wood B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1114-1121. PubMed ID: 29940248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates in patients undergoing MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy with two different software-based systems.
Hanske J; Risse Y; Roghmann F; Pucheril D; Berg S; Tully KH; von Landenberg N; Wald J; Noldus J; Brock M
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 34734428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Venderink W; de Rooij M; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 28753777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-A Systematic Review.
Rai BP; Mayerhofer C; Somani BK; Kallidonis P; Nagele U; Tokas T
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):904-913. PubMed ID: 33478936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First report of robot-assisted transperineal fusion versus off-target biopsy in patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann S; Mischinger J; Amend B; Rausch S; Adam M; Scharpf M; Fend F; Kramer U; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kruck S
World J Urol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 27847972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided prostate biopsy: Current status of the cancer detection and the prospects of tailor-made medicine of the prostate cancer.
Shoji S
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 30637355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer detection and complications of transperineal prostate biopsy with antibiotics when indicated.
Boevé LMS; Bloemendal FT; de Bie KCC; van Haarst EP; Krul EJT; de Bruijn JJ; Beems S; Vanhommerig JW; Hovius MC; Ruiter AEC; Lagerveld BW; van Andel G
BJU Int; 2023 Oct; 132(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 37155185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phantom study of a novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating preinterventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasonography fusion.
Kuru TH; Roethke M; Popeneciu V; Teber D; Pahernik S; Zogal P; Schlemmer HP; Hadaschik BA; Hohenfellner M
J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):807-13. PubMed ID: 22283184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer.
Venderink W; van der Leest M; van Luijtelaar A; van de Ven WJM; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ
World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1849-1855. PubMed ID: 28871396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.
Tewes S; Hueper K; Hartung D; Imkamp F; Herrmann TR; Weidemann J; Renckly S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Peters I
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1707-14. PubMed ID: 25774003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of real-time elastography on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies.
Brock M; Löppenberg B; Roghmann F; Pelzer A; Dickmann M; Becker W; Martin-Seidel P; Sommerer F; Schenk L; Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; von Bodman C
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1191-7. PubMed ID: 25451832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis.
Martin PR; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073504. PubMed ID: 24989418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Accuracy of Transperineal MRI Fusion Biopsy in Comparison to Transrectal Biopsy with Regard to Incidental Histopathological Findings in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.
Dieffenbacher SC; Popeneciu IV; Radtke JP; Teber D; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA; Hatiboglu G
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 28190012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cost-effective transperineal prostate biopsy method utilizes the original transrectal setting.
Wu RC; Tung MC; Wu CH; Mai HC; Huang WL; Chen SH; Lin VC
Int Urol Nephrol; 2023 Nov; 55(11):2695-2701. PubMed ID: 37505427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
