These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27830459)

  • 1. Comparison of radial, brachial, and femoral accesses using hemostatic devices for percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Otsuka M; Shiode N; Nakao Y; Ikegami Y; Kobayashi Y; Takeuchi A; Harima A; Higaki T; Oi K; Dai K; Kawase T; Nakama Y; Suenari K; Nishioka K; Sakai K; Shimatani Y; Masaoka Y; Inoue I
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2018 Jan; 33(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27830459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison Between Radial Approach and Femoral Approach With Vascular Closure Devices on the Occurrence of Access-Site Complications and Periprocedural Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Rigattieri S; Sciahbasi A; Ratib K; Alonzo A; Cox N; Chodór P; Berni A; Fedele S; Pugliese FR; Cooper CJ; Louvard Y; Nolan J; Rao SV
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 28(12):473-479. PubMed ID: 27630147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients undergoing PCI from the femoral route by default radial operators are at high risk of vascular access-site complications.
    Rafie IM; Uddin MM; Ossei-Gerning N; Anderson RA; Kinnaird TD
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Feb; 9(10):1189-94. PubMed ID: 24561736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radial arterial access is a safe alternative to brachial artery and femoral artery access for endovascular lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.
    Maximus S; Kwong M; Harding J; Mell M
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Mar; 77(3):870-876. PubMed ID: 36328139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome].
    Gao L; Liu Y; Xue Q; Tian J; Wang Y
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jul; 94(26):2025-9. PubMed ID: 25312663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Téblick A; Vanderbruggen W; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SEF; Miljoen H; Segers V; Wouters K; Vrints C; Claeys MJ
    Acta Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 73(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 28851255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Access Site-Related Complications and Quality of Life in Patients after Invasive Cardiology Procedures According to the Use of Radial, Femoral, or Brachial Approach.
    Roczniak J; Koziołek W; Piechocki M; Tokarek T; Surdacki A; Bartuś S; Chyrchel M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34200250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Radial Access, Guided Femoral Access, and Non-Guided Femoral Access Among Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Koshy LM; Aberle LH; Krucoff MW; Hess CN; Mazzaferri E; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Gibson CM; Mehran R; Gilchrist IC; Rao SV
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 30(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 29035844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Active Versus Passive Anchoring Vascular Closure Devices Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Safety and Efficacy Comparative Analysis.
    Baker NC; Escarcega RO; Lipinski MJ; Magalhaes MA; Koifman E; Kiramijyan S; Negi SI; Torguson R; Waksman R
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 29(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 26728544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention.
    Applegate R; Sacrinty M; Schafer P; Smith J; Gandhi S; Kutcher M; Santos R; Cecile A; Little W
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E375-84. PubMed ID: 23074085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.
    Rao SV; Hess CN; Barham B; Aberle LH; Anstrom KJ; Patel TB; Jorgensen JP; Mazzaferri EL; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Newby LK; Gibson CM; Kong DF; Mehran R; Waksman R; Gilchrist IC; McCourt BJ; Messenger JC; Peterson ED; Harrington RA; Krucoff MW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):857-67. PubMed ID: 25147030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Access Site and Outcomes for Unprotected Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database.
    Kinnaird T; Anderson R; Gallagher S; Sirker A; Ludman P; de Belder M; Copt S; Oldroyd K; Curzen N; Banning A; Mamas M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 11(24):2480-2491. PubMed ID: 30573059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Benefits Conferred by Radial Access for Cardiac Catheterization Are Offset by a Paradoxical Increase in the Rate of Vascular Access Site Complications With Femoral Access: The Campeau Radial Paradox.
    Azzalini L; Tosin K; Chabot-Blanchet M; Avram R; Ly HQ; Gaudet B; Gallo R; Doucet S; Tanguay JF; Ibrahim R; Grégoire JC; Crépeau J; Bonan R; de Guise P; Nosair M; Dorval JF; Gosselin G; L'Allier PL; Guertin MC; Asgar AW; Jolicœur EM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 8(14):1854-64. PubMed ID: 26604063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.
    Iwachow P; Miechowicz I; Kałmucki P; Dziki B; Szyszka A; Baszko A; Siminiak T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28364175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Major Cardiovascular Outcomes for Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.
    Ruiz-Rodriguez E; Asfour A; Lolay G; Ziada KM; Abdel-Latif AK
    South Med J; 2016 Jan; 109(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 26741877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vascular Closure Devices Attenuate Femoral Access Complications of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Beraldo de Andrade P; de Ribamar Costa J; Rinaldi FS; de Castro Bienert IR; Barbosa RA; Esteves V; Tebet M; Zukowski C; Maia F; Piva E Mattos LA; Labrunie A; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 32(10):364-370. PubMed ID: 32999089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of 2 devices for radial artery hemostasis after transradial coronary intervention.
    Dai N; Xu DC; Hou L; Peng WH; Wei YD; Xu YW
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2015; 30(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 24496325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of collagen-based vascular closure devices in patients with vs. without severe peripheral artery disease.
    Kara K; Kahlert P; Mahabadi AA; Plicht B; Lind AY; Longwitz D; Bollow M; Erbel R
    J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Feb; 21(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 24502487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Brener MI; Bush A; Miller JM; Hasan RK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1093-1104. PubMed ID: 28544320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radial Versus Femoral Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: MACE Outcomes at Long-Term Follow-up.
    Campelo-Parada F; Carrié D; Bartorelli AL; Namiki A; Hovasse T; Kimura T; Serra-Peñaranda A; Varenne O; Lalmand J; Kadota K; Ikari Y; Tobaru T; Fujii K; Nakamura S; Saito S; Wijns W;
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):262-268. PubMed ID: 29958176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.