111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27830769)
1. Graphlet characteristics in directed networks.
Trpevski I; Dimitrova T; Boshkovski T; Stikov N; Kocarev L
Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37057. PubMed ID: 27830769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures.
Sonmez AB; Can T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 4):135. PubMed ID: 28361704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Graphlet-Based Topological Characterization of the Resting-State Network in Healthy People.
Finotelli P; Piccardi C; Miglio E; Dulio P
Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():665544. PubMed ID: 33994939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Graphlet Laplacians for topology-function and topology-disease relationships.
Windels SFL; Malod-Dognin N; Pržulj N
Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(24):5226-5234. PubMed ID: 31192358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Graphlet signature-based scoring method to estimate protein-ligand binding affinity.
Singh O; Sawariya K; Aparoy P
R Soc Open Sci; 2014 Dec; 1(4):140306. PubMed ID: 26064572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Graphlet-based measures are suitable for biological network comparison.
Hayes W; Sun K; Pržulj N
Bioinformatics; 2013 Feb; 29(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 23349212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relation between structural and functional connectivity patterns in complex brain networks.
Stam CJ; van Straaten EC; Van Dellen E; Tewarie P; Gong G; Hillebrand A; Meier J; Van Mieghem P
Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 May; 103():149-60. PubMed ID: 25678023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IncGraph: Incremental graphlet counting for topology optimisation.
Cannoodt R; Ruyssinck J; Ramon J; De Preter K; Saeys Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195997. PubMed ID: 29698494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proper evaluation of alignment-free network comparison methods.
Yaveroğlu ÖN; Milenković T; Pržulj N
Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2697-704. PubMed ID: 25810431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Constructing fMRI connectivity networks: a whole brain functional parcellation method for node definition.
Maggioni E; Tana MG; Arrigoni F; Zucca C; Bianchi AM
J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 228():86-99. PubMed ID: 24675050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative network analysis via differential graphlet communities.
Wong SW; Cercone N; Jurisica I
Proteomics; 2015 Jan; 15(2-3):608-17. PubMed ID: 25283527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kernel-Granger causality and the analysis of dynamical networks.
Marinazzo D; Pellicoro M; Stramaglia S
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 May; 77(5 Pt 2):056215. PubMed ID: 18643150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of human disease genes from interactome network using graphlet interaction.
Wang XD; Huang JL; Yang L; Wei DQ; Qi YX; Jiang ZL
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86142. PubMed ID: 24465923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using multivariate cross correlations, Granger causality and graphical models to quantify spatiotemporal synchronization and causality between pest populations.
Damos P
BMC Ecol; 2016 Aug; 16():33. PubMed ID: 27495149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Graphlet eigencentralities capture novel central roles of genes in pathways.
Windels SFL; Malod-Dognin N; Pržulj N
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0261676. PubMed ID: 35077468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Random matrix theory for analyzing the brain functional network in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Wang R; Wang L; Yang Y; Li J; Wu Y; Lin P
Phys Rev E; 2016 Nov; 94(5-1):052411. PubMed ID: 27967144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution.
Przulj N
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e177-83. PubMed ID: 17237089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of Graphlet Counts in Massive Networks.
Rossi RA; Zhou R; Ahmed NK
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2019 Jan; 30(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 29994543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sampling frequency dependent visibility graphlet approach to time series.
Wang Y; Weng T; Deng S; Gu C; Yang H
Chaos; 2019 Feb; 29(2):023109. PubMed ID: 30823737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The Granger causality models and their applications in brain effective connectivity networks].
Zhao T; Zheng G; Pan Z; Li Q; Wang L; Lu G
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 30(6):1343-9. PubMed ID: 24645623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
