These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27830785)
21. China's research-evaluation revamp should not mean fewer international collaborations. Nature; 2020 Mar; 579(7797):8. PubMed ID: 32132699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The battle of the quality: leaders of Latin American ranking, USP and Unicamp discuss how to raise the impact of its research. Marques F Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2010; 25(3):426. PubMed ID: 21103757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Journal of Hepatology: The Home of Liver Research, 2015-2019. Jalan R; Bataller R; Berg T; Lotersztajn S; Moreau R; Zucman-Rossi J; Walicki J J Hepatol; 2019 Dec; 71(6):1065-1069. PubMed ID: 31739918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Science publishing: The golden club. Reich ES Nature; 2013 Oct; 502(7471):291-3. PubMed ID: 24132273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Measuring the unmeasurable: assessing the quality of science and scientists. Lüscher TF Eur Heart J; 2018 May; 39(20):1765-1769. PubMed ID: 29788304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Encouraging academic competition in Europe. Fava GA; Breno E; Guardabasso V; Stefanelli M Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5599):1715-6. PubMed ID: 12462236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. How inbreeding affects productivity in Europe. Soler M Nature; 2001 May; 411(6834):132. PubMed ID: 11346762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Controversial impact factor gets a heavyweight rival. Van Noorden R Nature; 2016 Dec; 540(7633):325-326. PubMed ID: 27974784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Using the impact factor and H index to assess researchers and publications. Thomaz PG; Assad RS; Moreira LF Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 Feb; 96(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 21445465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Noble halls of discovery. Hornyak T Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7697):S73. PubMed ID: 29565404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. China awaits controversial blacklist of 'poor quality' journals. Cyranoski D Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7728):471-472. PubMed ID: 30353153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students? Sanchis-Gomar F EMBO Rep; 2014 Mar; 15(3):207. PubMed ID: 24473241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comments on paper by Thomas et al: how to evaluate "quality of publication". Benchimol Barbosa PR Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 97(1):87; author reply 88-9. PubMed ID: 21894398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Additional comments on the paper by Thomas et al: how to evaluate "quality of publication". Benchimol-Barbosa PR; Ribeiro RL; Barbosa EC Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 97(1):88; author reply 88-9. PubMed ID: 21894399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Cash for papers: putting a premium on publication. Fuyuno I; Cyranoski D Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7095):792. PubMed ID: 16778850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Impact factor, its variants and its influence in academic promotion]. Puche RC Medicina (B Aires); 2011; 71(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 22057180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Competition in biology: it's a scoop! Pearson H Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):222-3. PubMed ID: 14628017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Academic elitism or the obsession with the impact factor]. Ossa JL Medwave; 2015 Mar; 15(2):e6100. PubMed ID: 25825904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]