These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27831692)

  • 1. A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of trainee opinions of four methods of personality disorder diagnosis.
    Nelson SM; Huprich SK; Shankar S; Sohnleitner A; Paggeot AV
    Personal Disord; 2017 Jul; 8(3):217-227. PubMed ID: 27831692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing DSM-5-Hybrid, SWAP, and PDM prototype models of personality disorders: Convergent and divergent findings.
    Huprich SK; Jowers C; Nelson S
    Personal Disord; 2019 Jul; 10(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 31033327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient SWAP-200 personality dimensions and FFM traits: Do they predict therapist responses?
    Tanzilli A; Lingiardi V; Hilsenroth M
    Personal Disord; 2018 May; 9(3):250-262. PubMed ID: 28836804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinician judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders and the alternative model for DSM-5 personality disorders.
    Morey LC; Skodol AE; Oldham JM
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2014 May; 123(2):398-405. PubMed ID: 24886013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the dependability and associations with functioning of the DSM-5 Section III trait model of personality pathology and the DSM-5 Section II personality disorder model.
    Chmielewski M; Ruggero CJ; Kotov R; Liu K; Krueger RF
    Personal Disord; 2017 Jul; 8(3):228-236. PubMed ID: 27618342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrepancies in self- and informant-reports of personality pathology: Examining the DSM-5 Section III trait model.
    Carnovale M; Carlson EN; Quilty LC; Bagby RM
    Personal Disord; 2019 Sep; 10(5):456-467. PubMed ID: 31259602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining criterion a: DSM-5 level of personality functioning as assessed through life story interviews.
    Cruitt PJ; Boudreaux MJ; King HR; Oltmanns JR; Oltmanns TF
    Personal Disord; 2019 May; 10(3):224-234. PubMed ID: 30556720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative validity of the Shedler and Westen Assessment Procedure-200.
    Mullins-Sweatt SN; Widiger TA
    Psychol Assess; 2008 Jun; 20(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 18557696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revising and assessing axis II, Part I: developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method.
    Westen D; Shedler J
    Am J Psychiatry; 1999 Feb; 156(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 9989563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical utility of the Five-Factor Model of personality disorder.
    Mullins-Sweatt SN; Lengel GJ
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1615-39. PubMed ID: 22321379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinicians' Judgments of the Clinical Utility of Personality Disorder Trait Descriptions.
    Crego C; Sleep CE; Widiger TA
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2016 Jan; 204(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 26588083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuity between interview-rated personality disorders and self-reported DSM-5 traits in a Danish psychiatric sample.
    Bach B; Anderson J; Simonsen E
    Personal Disord; 2017 Jul; 8(3):261-267. PubMed ID: 26784892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the SWAP-200 in a personality-disordered forensic population: is it valid, reliable and useful?
    Marin-Avellan LE; McGauley G; Campbell C; Fonagy P
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(1):28-45. PubMed ID: 16470497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The clinical utility of the Five Factor Model of personality disorder.
    Glover NG; Crego C; Widiger TA
    Personal Disord; 2012 Apr; 3(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 22452766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refining personality disorder diagnosis: integrating science and practice.
    Shedler J; Westen D
    Am J Psychiatry; 2004 Aug; 161(8):1350-65. PubMed ID: 15285958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient and clinician agreement on personality using the SWAP-200.
    Davidson KM; Obonsawin MC; Seils M; Patience L
    J Pers Disord; 2003 Jun; 17(3):208-18. PubMed ID: 12839100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM-5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF).
    Hutsebaut J; Feenstra DJ; Kamphuis JH
    Personal Disord; 2016 Apr; 7(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 26595344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinicians' judgments of clinical utility: a comparison of the DSM-IV with dimensional models of general personality.
    Lowe JR; Widiger TA
    J Pers Disord; 2009 Jun; 23(3):211-29. PubMed ID: 19538078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Shedler and Westen Assessment Procedure from the perspective of general personality structure.
    Mullins-Sweatt S; Widiger TA
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2007 Aug; 116(3):618-23. PubMed ID: 17696718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Theoretical Orientation and Training on Preference for Diagnostic Models of Personality Pathology.
    Paggeot A; Nelson S; Huprich S
    Psychopathology; 2017; 50(5):304-320. PubMed ID: 29020682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.