These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27831728)

  • 21. Complementary approaches to the assessment of personality disorder. The Personality Assessment Schedule and Adult Personality Functioning Assessment compared.
    Hill J; Fudge H; Harrington R; Pickles A; Rutter M
    Br J Psychiatry; 2000 May; 176():434-9. PubMed ID: 10912218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Agreement Between Self- and Informant-Reported Ratings of Personality Traits: The Moderating Effects of Major Depressive and/or Panic Disorder.
    Lieberman L; Gorka SM; Huggins AA; Katz AC; Sarapas C; Shankman SA
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2016 Apr; 204(4):306-13. PubMed ID: 26658660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The impact of the big five personality traits on reports of child behavior problems by different informants.
    Kroes G; Veerman JW; De Bruyn EE
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 2005 Apr; 33(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 15839500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The clinical utility of the Five Factor Model of personality disorder.
    Glover NG; Crego C; Widiger TA
    Personal Disord; 2012 Apr; 3(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 22452766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meta-accuracy and relationship quality: Weighing the costs and benefits of knowing what people really think about you.
    Carlson EN
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Aug; 111(2):250-64. PubMed ID: 27337137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. BIS and BAS Sensitivities at Different Levels of Personality Description: A Latent-Variable Approach with Self- and Informant-Ratings.
    Vecchione M; Ghezzi V; Alessandri G; Dentale F; Corr PJ
    J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(2):246-257. PubMed ID: 32242753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing the dependability and associations with functioning of the DSM-5 Section III trait model of personality pathology and the DSM-5 Section II personality disorder model.
    Chmielewski M; Ruggero CJ; Kotov R; Liu K; Krueger RF
    Personal Disord; 2017 Jul; 8(3):228-236. PubMed ID: 27618342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Convergence of Self-Reports and Informant Reports on the Personality Assessment Screener.
    Kelley SE; Edens JF; Morey LC
    Assessment; 2017 Dec; 24(8):999-1007. PubMed ID: 26951323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing the assessors: The feasibility and validity of clinicians as a source for personality disorder research.
    Samuel DB; Bucher MA
    Personal Disord; 2017 Apr; 8(2):104-112. PubMed ID: 28358576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Personality evaluated: What do people most like and dislike about themselves and their friends?
    Sun J; Neufeld B; Snelgrove P; Vazire S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Apr; 122(4):731-748. PubMed ID: 35254856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing the validity of informant and self-reports of personality using laboratory indices of emotional responding as criterion variables.
    Lieberman L; Liu H; Huggins AA; Katz AC; Zvolensky MJ; Shankman SA
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Sep; 53(9):1386-97. PubMed ID: 27273802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing maladaptive traits in youth: An English-language version of the Dimensional Personality Symptom Itempool.
    Decuyper M; De Clercq B; Tackett JL
    Personal Disord; 2015 Jul; 6(3):239-250. PubMed ID: 25799201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Asymmetry in judgments of personality: others are less differentiated than the self.
    Beer A; Watson D
    J Pers; 2008 Jun; 76(3):535-60. PubMed ID: 18399954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Thin slices of child personality: Perceptual, situational, and behavioral contributions.
    Tackett JL; Herzhoff K; Kushner SC; Rule N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jan; 110(1):150-66. PubMed ID: 25938703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinician ratings of vulnerable and grandiose narcissistic features: Implications for an expanded narcissistic personality disorder diagnosis.
    Stanton K; Zimmerman M
    Personal Disord; 2018 May; 9(3):263-272. PubMed ID: 29215903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Antagonism trait facets and comprehensive psychosocial disability: Comparing information across self, informant, and interviewer reports.
    Ro E; Nuzum H; Clark LA
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2017 Oct; 126(7):890-897. PubMed ID: 29106274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Concordance between patients and informants on the personality disorder examination.
    Riso LP; Klein DN; Anderson RL; Ouimette PC; Lizardi H
    Am J Psychiatry; 1994 Apr; 151(4):568-73. PubMed ID: 8147455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Get a second opinion: Comment on Bleidorn et al. (2019).
    McCrae RR
    Am Psychol; 2020; 75(5):729-730. PubMed ID: 32673018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patients' and informants' reports of personality traits during and after major depression.
    Peselow ED; Sanfilipo MP; Fieve RR
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1994 Nov; 103(4):819-24. PubMed ID: 7822585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prospective prediction of college adjustment using self- and informant-rated personality traits.
    Kurtz JE; Puher MA; Cross NA
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 22489598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.