148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27831857)
21. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours.
Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G
Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification.
Salfity MF; Nishikawa RM; Jiang Y; Papaioannou J
Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 12772990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nonlinear unsharp masking for mammogram enhancement.
Panetta K; Zhou Y; Agaian S; Jia H
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 Nov; 15(6):918-28. PubMed ID: 21843996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast Cancer Detection using Crow Search Optimization based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Clustering with Neighborhood Attraction.
S P; N KV; S S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jan; 20(1):157-165. PubMed ID: 30678427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
Vadivel A; Surendiran B
Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment.
Zheng B; Lu A; Hardesty LA; Sumkin JH; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Gur D
Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 16485416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography.
Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computerized detection of colorectal masses in CT colonography based on fuzzy merging and wall-thickening analysis.
Näppi JJ; Frimmel H; Dachman AH; Yoshida H
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):860-72. PubMed ID: 15125004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improved location features for linkage of regions across ipsilateral mammograms.
Tanner C; van Schie G; Lesniak JM; Karssemeijer N; Székely G
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1265-72. PubMed ID: 23731758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Segmentation of mammography by applying GrowCut for mass detection.
Cordeiro FR; Santos WP; Silva-Filhoa AG
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():87-91. PubMed ID: 23920521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Scale-space signatures for the detection of clustered microcalculations in digital mammograms.
Netsch T; Peitgen HO
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Sep; 18(9):774-86. PubMed ID: 10571382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computerized decision support system for mass identification in breast using digital mammogram: a study on GA-based neuro-fuzzy approaches.
Das A; Bhattacharya M
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():523-33. PubMed ID: 21431593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
