BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27831863)

  • 1. Quantifying Registration Uncertainty With Sparse Bayesian Modelling.
    Le Folgoc L; Delingette H; Criminisi A; Ayache N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36(2):607-617. PubMed ID: 27831863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sparse Bayesian registration of medical images for self-tuning of parameters and spatially adaptive parametrization of displacements.
    Le Folgoc L; Delingette H; Criminisi A; Ayache N
    Med Image Anal; 2017 Feb; 36():79-97. PubMed ID: 27870999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast Bayesian whole-brain fMRI analysis with spatial 3D priors.
    Sidén P; Eklund A; Bolin D; Villani M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():211-225. PubMed ID: 27876654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating uncertainty in MRF-based image segmentation: A perfect-MCMC approach.
    Awate SP; Garg S; Jena R
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Jul; 55():181-196. PubMed ID: 31085445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hierarchical Bayesian estimates of distributed MEG sources: theoretical aspects and comparison of variational and MCMC methods.
    Nummenmaa A; Auranen T; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Sams M; Vehtari A
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(2):669-85. PubMed ID: 17300961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abrupt motion tracking via intensively adaptive Markov-chain Monte Carlo sampling.
    Zhou X; Lu Y; Lu J; Zhou J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Feb; 21(2):789-801. PubMed ID: 21937350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hierarchical Bayesian sparse image reconstruction with application to MRFM.
    Dobigeon N; Hero AO; Tourneret JY
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Sep; 18(9):2059-70. PubMed ID: 19493849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying the uncertainty in model parameters using Gaussian process-based Markov chain Monte Carlo in cardiac electrophysiology.
    Dhamala J; Arevalo HJ; Sapp J; Horácek BM; Wu KC; Trayanova NA; Wang L
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():43-57. PubMed ID: 29843078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian Multiple Emitter Fitting using Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
    Fazel M; Wester MJ; Mazloom-Farsibaf H; Meddens MBM; Eklund AS; Schlichthaerle T; Schueder F; Jungmann R; Lidke KA
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13791. PubMed ID: 31551452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporating Contact Network Uncertainty in Individual Level Models of Infectious Disease using Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Almutiry W; Deardon R
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 31812945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: a high performance computing framework.
    Angelikopoulos P; Papadimitriou C; Koumoutsakos P
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Oct; 137(14):144103. PubMed ID: 23061835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fully Bayesian estimation of Gibbs hyperparameters for emission computed tomography data.
    Higdon DM; Bowsher JE; Johnson VE; Turkington TG; Gilland DR; Jaszczak RJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):516-26. PubMed ID: 9368107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian MRI reconstruction with joint uncertainty estimation using diffusion models.
    Luo G; Blumenthal M; Heide M; Uecker M
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 Jul; 90(1):295-311. PubMed ID: 36912453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of uncertainty-based work injury model using Bayesian structural equation modelling.
    Chatterjee S
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2014; 21(4):318-27. PubMed ID: 24111548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction uncertainty assessment of chromatography models using Bayesian inference.
    Briskot T; Stückler F; Wittkopp F; Williams C; Yang J; Konrad S; Doninger K; Griesbach J; Bennecke M; Hepbildikler S; Hubbuch J
    J Chromatogr A; 2019 Feb; 1587():101-110. PubMed ID: 30579636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variational Bayes inference for hidden Markov diagnostic classification models.
    Yamaguchi K; Martinez AJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Feb; 77(1):55-79. PubMed ID: 37249065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for decoding neural spike trains.
    Ahmadian Y; Pillow JW; Paninski L
    Neural Comput; 2011 Jan; 23(1):46-96. PubMed ID: 20964539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian inference on a microstructural, hyperelastic model of tendon deformation.
    Haughton J; Cotter SL; Parnell WJ; Shearer T
    J R Soc Interface; 2022 May; 19(190):20220031. PubMed ID: 35582809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing two sequential Monte Carlo samplers for exact and approximate Bayesian inference on biological models.
    Daly AC; Cooper J; Gavaghan DJ; Holmes C
    J R Soc Interface; 2017 Sep; 14(134):. PubMed ID: 28931636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Layer adaptive node selection in Bayesian neural networks: Statistical guarantees and implementation details.
    Jantre S; Bhattacharya S; Maiti T
    Neural Netw; 2023 Oct; 167():309-330. PubMed ID: 37666188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.