These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27832005)

  • 1. Older Individuals Meeting Medicare Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet: Are These Patients Improved by Surgery?
    Mudery JA; Francis R; McCrary H; Jacob A
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 27832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond Sentence Recognition in Quiet for Older Adults: Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Zhang E; Coelho DH
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):979-986. PubMed ID: 29912832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Cochlear Implants for Adult Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years or Older Who Meet Expanded Indications of Open-Set Sentence Recognition: A Multicenter Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
    Zwolan TA; Kallogjeri D; Firszt JB; Buchman CA
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(10):933-941. PubMed ID: 32857106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
    Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear Implant Qualification in Noise Versus Quiet: Do Patients Demonstrate Similar Postoperative Benefits?
    Schauwecker N; Patro A; Holder JT; Bennett ML; Perkins E; Moberly AC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 May; 170(5):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 38353294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 1, Candidacy Assessment and Expanding Indications.
    Carlson ML; Sladen DP; Gurgel RK; Tombers NM; Lohse CM; Driscoll CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e12-e19. PubMed ID: 29210952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation.
    Dornhoffer JR; Reddy P; Meyer TA; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 33410869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further Evidence for Individual Ear Consideration in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation.
    Patro A; Lindquist NR; Holder JT; Tawfik KO; O'Malley MR; Bennett ML; Haynes DS; Gifford R; Perkins EL
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Oct; 43(9):1033-1040. PubMed ID: 36075098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Age on Noise Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Shew MA; Herzog JA; Kallogjeri D; Chen S; Wick C; Durakovic N; McJunkin J; Buchman CA;
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 34889840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
    Buchman CA; Herzog JA; McJunkin JL; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Firszt JB; Kallogjeri D;
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(10):916-924. PubMed ID: 32857113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of a Hearing Registry: Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Quiet Versus Noise in 1,611 Patients.
    Dunn C; Miller SE; Schafer EC; Silva C; Gifford RH; Grisel JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 29(4):851-861. PubMed ID: 32966101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral Cochlear Implantation Versus Bimodal Hearing in Patients With Functional Residual Hearing: A Within-subjects Comparison of Audiologic Performance and Quality of Life.
    Yawn RJ; O'Connell BP; Dwyer RT; Sunderhaus LW; Reynolds S; Haynes DS; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):422-427. PubMed ID: 29533331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Speech Test Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Patients With and Without Asymmetric Hearing Loss.
    Misztal C; Peña S; Martinez D; Velandia S; Goncalves S; Ma R; Holcomb M; Angeli S; Telischi F; Dinh CT
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jun; 43(5):559-566. PubMed ID: 35261377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes in Patients Meeting Cochlear Implant Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet.
    Thai A; Tran E; Swanson A; Fitzgerald MB; Blevins NH; Ma Y; Smith ML; Larky JB; Alyono JC
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 34889839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When to Refer a Hearing-impaired Patient for a Cochlear Implant Evaluation.
    Hunter JB; Tolisano AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jun; 42(5):e530-e535. PubMed ID: 33394941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do Patients Benefit From a Cochlear Implant When They Qualify Only in the Presence of Background Noise?
    Lundberg EMH; Strong D; Anderson M; Kaizer AM; Gubbels S
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Feb; 42(2):251-259. PubMed ID: 33229878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.