These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27832519)

  • 1. Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.
    Wang J; Kato F; Yamashita H; Baba M; Cui Y; Li R; Oyama-Manabe N; Shirato H
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 27832519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast density quantification in dual-energy mammography using virtual anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Pacheco G; Castillo-Lopez JP; Villaseñor-Navarro Y; Brandan ME
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14360. PubMed ID: 38648734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammography.
    Fowler EE; Sellers TA; Lu B; Heine JJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):113502. PubMed ID: 24320473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort.
    Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Fieselmann A; Lång K; Sartor H
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):330-336. PubMed ID: 29943180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT.
    Geeraert N; Klausz R; Cockmartin L; Muller S; Bosmans H; Bloch I
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4391-409. PubMed ID: 25049219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of bariatric surgery on qualitative and quantitative breast density.
    Hassinger TE; Mehaffey JH; Knisely AT; Contrella BN; Brenin DR; Schroen AT; Schirmer BD; Hallowell PT; Harvey JA; Showalter SL
    Breast J; 2019 Nov; 25(6):1198-1205. PubMed ID: 31310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated volumetric breast density estimation out of digital breast tomosynthesis data: feasibility study of a new software version.
    Machida Y; Saita A; Namba H; Fukuma E
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):780. PubMed ID: 27386266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
    Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
    Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Pawluczyk O; Augustine BJ; Yaffe MJ; Rico D; Yang J; Mawdsley GE; Boyd NF
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 12674236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the association between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer using Quantra software and the BI-RADS classification.
    Wang JM; Zhao HG; Liu TT; Wang FY
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(46):e23112. PubMed ID: 33181680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
    Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of automated volumetric breast density assessment in short-term digital mammography reimaging.
    Ko ES; Kim RB; Han BK
    Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 25754139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calibrated breast density methods for full field digital mammography: a system for serial quality control and inter-system generalization.
    Lu B; Smallwood AM; Sellers TA; Drukteinis JS; Heine JJ; Fowler EE
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):623-36. PubMed ID: 25652480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006.
    Chen L; Ray S; Keller BM; Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 27002418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying masking in clinical mammograms via local detectability of simulated lesions.
    Mainprize JG; Alonzo-Proulx O; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1249-58. PubMed ID: 26936709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.