These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27833928)

  • 1. Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients.
    Kongsap P
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2016; 3():27. PubMed ID: 27833928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
    Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation and comparison of a novel Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with standard partial coherence interferometry for biometry and intraocular lens power calculation.
    Wang Z; Yang W; Li D; Chen W; Zhao Q; Li Y; Cui R; Shen L; Xian J
    Exp Ther Med; 2021 Apr; 21(4):326. PubMed ID: 33732299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
    Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
    Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
    Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
    Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparision of two new optical biometry devices with an ultrasonic immersion biometer].
    Chiseliţă D; Cantemir A; Gălăţanu C; Irod A
    Oftalmologia; 2011; 55(4):104-10. PubMed ID: 22642145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a new swept-source optical biometer with a partial coherence interferometry.
    Lee HK; Kim MK
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):269. PubMed ID: 30340561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices.
    Rabsilber TM; Jepsen C; Auffarth GU; Holzer MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 20152602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of refractive outcomes obtained with two swept-source OCT-based optical biometers after cataract surgery: A study of 152 eyes.
    Agard E; Levron A; Billant J; Douma I; Dot C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2024 Jun; 47(6):104186. PubMed ID: 38663226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
    An Y; Kang EK; Kim H; Kang MJ; Byun YS; Joo CK
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 30678658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 20362858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agreement of ocular biometry measurements between 2 biometers.
    Yeu E
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1130-1134. PubMed ID: 31279621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.