These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27834028)

  • 1. Risk factors for failure in the management of cervical caries lesions.
    Wierichs RJ; Kramer EJ; Meyer-Lueckel H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jul; 21(6):2123-2131. PubMed ID: 27834028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors for failure of class V restorations of carious cervical lesions in general dental practices.
    Wierichs RJ; Kramer EJ; Meyer-Lueckel H
    J Dent; 2018 Oct; 77():87-92. PubMed ID: 30031788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk Factors for Failure of Direct Restorations in General Dental Practices.
    Wierichs RJ; Kramer EJ; Meyer-Lueckel H
    J Dent Res; 2020 Aug; 99(9):1039-1046. PubMed ID: 32437636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
    Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic factors of single-visit endodontic and restorative treatment under general anaesthesia for special needs patients.
    Chang J; Kim HY
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Feb; 44(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 27862171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Hesse D; de Araujo MP; Olegário IC; Innes N; Raggio DP; Bonifácio CC
    Trials; 2016 Mar; 17():169. PubMed ID: 27029801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique: a retrospective study.
    Ludwig KH; Fontana M; Vinson LA; Platt JA; Dean JA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Dec; 145(12):1248-53. PubMed ID: 25429038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are direct restorations an effective treatment strategy in the management of root caries lesions?
    Mustafa S; Fee PA
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Sep; 23(3):102-103. PubMed ID: 36151281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restorative treatment for geriatric root caries.
    White SN; MacEntee MI; Cho G
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1994 Mar; 22(3):55-60. PubMed ID: 7518869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Restoration outcomes after restoring vital teeth with advanced caries lesions: a practice-based retrospective study.
    Schwendicke F; Krüger H; Schlattmann P; Paris S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1675-81. PubMed ID: 26572531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occlusal sealant success over ten years in a private practice: comparing longevity of sealants placed by dentists, hygienists, and assistants.
    Folke BD; Walton JL; Feigal RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 15460298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ART and conventional root restorations in elders after 12 months.
    Lo EC; Luo Y; Tan HP; Dyson JE; Corbet EF
    J Dent Res; 2006 Oct; 85(10):929-32. PubMed ID: 16998134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental materials for the restoration of root surface caries.
    Burgess JO
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):342-51. PubMed ID: 8695014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.
    Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics.
    Da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Donassollo TA; Cenci MS; Loguércio AD; Moraes RR; Bronkhorst EM; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
    Dent Mater; 2011 Oct; 27(10):955-63. PubMed ID: 21762980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
    Namgung C; Rho YJ; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
    Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment history of teeth in relation to the longevity of the teeth and their restorations: outcomes of teeth treated and maintained for 15 years.
    Miyamoto T; Morgano SM; Kumagai T; Jones JA; Nunn ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 17394913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT.
    Anna Luisa de Brito P; Isabel Cristina O; Clarissa Calil B; Ana Flávia Bissoto C; José Carlos Pettorossi I; Daniela Prócida R
    Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e88. PubMed ID: 29116299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.