171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27834282)
1. The Use of Technology for Estimating Body Composition
Teigen LM; Kuchnia AJ; Mourtzakis M; Earthman CP
Nutr Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 32(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 27834282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Body Composition Technology: Implications for the ICU.
Mundi MS; Patel JJ; Martindale R
Nutr Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 34(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 30586471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Body Composition Tools for Assessment of Adult Malnutrition at the Bedside: A Tutorial on Research Considerations and Clinical Applications.
Earthman CP
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2015 Sep; 39(7):787-822. PubMed ID: 26287016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring and monitoring lean body mass in critical illness.
Looijaard WGPM; Molinger J; Weijs PJM
Curr Opin Crit Care; 2018 Aug; 24(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 29847342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phase Angle and Impedance Ratio: Reference Cut-Points From the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004 From Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Data.
Kuchnia AJ; Teigen LM; Cole AJ; Mulasi U; Gonzalez MC; Heymsfield SB; Vock DM; Earthman CP
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2017 Nov; 41(8):1310-1315. PubMed ID: 27670250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bioimpedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in peritoneal dialysis patients according to edema.
Kang SH; Cho KH; Park JW; Yoon KW; Do JY
Clin Nephrol; 2013 Apr; 79(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 23195834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective Data Assessment (ODA) Methods as Nutritional Assessment Tools.
Hamada Y
J Med Invest; 2015; 62(3-4):119-22. PubMed ID: 26399333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current technologies in body composition assessment: advantages and disadvantages.
Ceniccola GD; Castro MG; Piovacari SMF; Horie LM; Corrêa FG; Barrere APN; Toledo DO
Nutrition; 2019 Jun; 62():25-31. PubMed ID: 30826596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Body Composition Post Pediatric Liver Transplant: Implications and Assessment.
Perteet-Jackson AD; Earthman CP; Larson-Nath CM
Nutr Clin Pract; 2021 Dec; 36(6):1173-1184. PubMed ID: 33242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Body composition and functional assessment of nutritional status in adults: a narrative review of imaging, impedance, strength and functional techniques.
Smith S; Madden AM
J Hum Nutr Diet; 2016 Dec; 29(6):714-732. PubMed ID: 27137882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioimpedance at the bedside: current applications, limitations, and opportunities.
Mulasi U; Kuchnia AJ; Cole AJ; Earthman CP
Nutr Clin Pract; 2015 Apr; 30(2):180-93. PubMed ID: 25613832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How common is malnutrition in ESRD? New approaches to diagnosis of malnutrition.
Kuhlmann MK; Levin NW
Blood Purif; 2008; 26(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18182796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midarm computerized tomography fat, muscle and total areas correlation with nutritional assessment data.
Jordão AA; Bellucci AD; Dutra de Oliveira JE; Sérgio Marchini J
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2004 Nov; 28(11):1451-5. PubMed ID: 15356669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Body composition: why, when and for who?
Thibault R; Genton L; Pichard C
Clin Nutr; 2012 Aug; 31(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 22296871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New trends in nutritional status assessment of cancer patients.
Andreoli A; De Lorenzo A; Cadeddu F; Iacopino L; Grande M
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 May; 15(5):469-80. PubMed ID: 21744742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Utility of Body Composition Assessment in Nutrition and Clinical Practice: An Overview of Current Methodology.
Holmes CJ; Racette SB
Nutrients; 2021 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 34444653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neonatal Body Composition: Measuring Lean Mass as a Tool to Guide Nutrition Management in the Neonate.
Rice MS; Valentine CJ
Nutr Clin Pract; 2015 Oct; 30(5):625-32. PubMed ID: 25908606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cross-sectional study.
Buckinx F; Reginster JY; Dardenne N; Croisiser JL; Kaux JF; Beaudart C; Slomian J; Bruyère O
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Mar; 16():60. PubMed ID: 25887598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Update on body composition tools in clinical settings: computed tomography, ultrasound, and bioimpedance applications for assessment and monitoring.
Price KL; Earthman CP
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2019 Feb; 73(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 30377307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 1.2.3 Use of technical measurements in nutritional assessment. 1.2 Nutritional assessment.
Zemel BS; Stallings VA
World Rev Nutr Diet; 2015; 113():19-22. PubMed ID: 25906850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
