These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27834282)

  • 61. [Role of impedance measurement in nutritional screening].
    Maisonneuve N; Genton L; Karsegard VL; Kyle UG; Dupertuis YM; Pichard C
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2004 Oct; 124(10):611-5. PubMed ID: 15573504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Challenges of nutritional assessment in pediatric ICU.
    Feferbaum R; Delgado AF; Zamberlan P; Leone C
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2009 May; 12(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 19318938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. How should we monitor nutritional support: structure or function?
    Jeejeebhoy KN
    New Horiz; 1994 May; 2(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 7922437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effect of nutritional support on routine nutrition assessment parameters and body composition in intensive care unit patients.
    Phang PT; Aeberhardt LE
    Can J Surg; 1996 Jun; 39(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 8640620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Assessment of nutritional status, body composition, and human immunodeficiency virus-associated morphologic changes.
    Knox TA; Zafonte-Sanders M; Fields-Gardner C; Moen K; Johansen D; Paton N
    Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Apr; 36(Suppl 2):S63-8. PubMed ID: 12652373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Impact of food and fluid intake on technical and biological measurement error in body composition assessment methods in athletes.
    Kerr A; Slater GJ; Byrne N
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Feb; 117(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 28382898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Comparison between nutritional risk tools and parameters derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis with subjective global assessment.
    Meireles MS; Wazlawik E; Bastos JL; Garcia MF
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Oct; 112(10):1543-9. PubMed ID: 23017565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Agreement of bioelectric impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition evaluation in adults with cystic fibrosis.
    Ziai S; Coriati A; Chabot K; Mailhot M; Richter MV; Rabasa-Lhoret R
    J Cyst Fibros; 2014 Sep; 13(5):585-8. PubMed ID: 24522087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A critical evaluation of body composition modalities used to assess adipose and skeletal muscle tissue in cancer.
    Di Sebastiano KM; Mourtzakis M
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2012 Oct; 37(5):811-21. PubMed ID: 22735036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Skeletal muscle mass and quality: evolution of modern measurement concepts in the context of sarcopenia.
    Heymsfield SB; Gonzalez MC; Lu J; Jia G; Zheng J
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2015 Nov; 74(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25851205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Nutritional effects of oesophageal, gastric and pancreatic carcinoma.
    Gupta R; Ihmaidat H
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2003 Oct; 29(8):634-43. PubMed ID: 14511609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Nutritional assessment in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy.
    Romeiro FG; Augusti L
    World J Hepatol; 2015 Dec; 7(30):2940-54. PubMed ID: 26730273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Digital anthropometry: a critical review.
    Heymsfield SB; Bourgeois B; Ng BK; Sommer MJ; Li X; Shepherd JA
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2018 May; 72(5):680-687. PubMed ID: 29748657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Further Studies of the Influence of Nutrition Upon the Chemical Composition of the Body.
    Sherman HC; Ragan MS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1947 Sep; 33(9):266-8. PubMed ID: 16588750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY OF BODY COMPOSITION IN MALNUTRITION].
    HAXHE JJ
    Ann Chir; 1964; 18():1080-90. PubMed ID: 14193619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Editorial: A different year from any before.
    Matthews DE; Norman K
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2020 Sep; 23(5):295. PubMed ID: 32769614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Response to "Body composition analysis via single slice computed tomography analysis - The shortcomings".
    Broughman JR; Williams GR; Muss HB
    J Geriatr Oncol; 2016 Jan; 7(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 26797669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Tissue characterization.
    Chivers RC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1981; 7(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 7015651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Editorial: Importance of body composition analysis in clinical nutrition.
    Bazzocchi A; Gazzotti S; Santarpia L; Madeddu C; Petroni ML; Aparisi Gómez MP
    Front Nutr; 2022; 9():1080636. PubMed ID: 36712513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Cardio-oncology: an overview on outpatient management and future developments.
    Teske AJ; Linschoten M; Kamphuis JAM; Naaktgeboren WR; Leiner T; van der Wall E; Kuball J; van Rhenen A; Doevendans PA; Cramer MJ; Asselbergs FW
    Neth Heart J; 2018 Nov; 26(11):521-532. PubMed ID: 30141030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.