327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27836515)
1. Comparison of anaerobic digestion strategies of nitrogen-rich substrates: Performance of anaerobic reactors and microbial community diversity.
Ziganshina EE; Ibragimov EM; Vankov PY; Miluykov VA; Ziganshin AM
Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():160-171. PubMed ID: 27836515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the Organic Loading Rate Increase and the Presence of Zeolite on Microbial Community Composition and Process Stability During Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Wastes.
Ziganshina EE; Belostotskiy DE; Ilinskaya ON; Boulygina EA; Grigoryeva TV; Ziganshin AM
Microb Ecol; 2015 Nov; 70(4):948-60. PubMed ID: 26045158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microbial community diversity in anaerobic reactors digesting turkey, chicken, and swine wastes.
Ziganshina EE; Belostotskiy DE; Shushlyaev RV; Miluykov VA; Vankov PY; Ziganshin AM
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):1464-772. PubMed ID: 25022523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of the substrate loading regime and phosphoric acid supplementation on performance of biogas reactors and microbial community dynamics during anaerobic digestion of chicken wastes.
Belostotskiy DE; Ziganshina EE; Siniagina M; Boulygina EA; Miluykov VA; Ziganshin AM
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Oct; 193():42-52. PubMed ID: 26117234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbial community shifts in biogas reactors upon complete or partial ammonia inhibition.
Lv Z; Leite AF; Harms H; Glaser K; Liebetrau J; Kleinsteuber S; Nikolausz M
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Jan; 103(1):519-533. PubMed ID: 30334088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of chicken manure: Microbial community dynamics and process resilience.
Niu Q; Takemura Y; Kubota K; Li YY
Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():114-22. PubMed ID: 26054964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioenergy production from diluted poultry manure and microbial consortium inside Anaerobic Sludge Bed Reactor at sub-mesophilic conditions.
Jaxybayeva A; Yangin-Gomec C; Cetecioglu Z; Ozbayram EG; Yilmaz F; Ince O
J Environ Sci Health B; 2014; 49(10):775-85. PubMed ID: 25065830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drivers of microbial community composition in mesophilic and thermophilic temperature-phased anaerobic digestion pre-treatment reactors.
Pervin HM; Dennis PG; Lim HJ; Tyson GW; Batstone DJ; Bond PL
Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(19):7098-108. PubMed ID: 24216229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influences of the substrate feeding regime on methanogenic activity in biogas reactors approached by molecular and stable isotope methods.
Lv Z; Leite AF; Harms H; Richnow HH; Liebetrau J; Nikolausz M
Anaerobe; 2014 Oct; 29():91-9. PubMed ID: 24291758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of organic loading on the microbiota in a temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) system co-digesting dairy manure and waste whey.
Li YF; Abraham C; Nelson MC; Chen PH; Graf J; Yu Z
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Oct; 99(20):8777-92. PubMed ID: 26084892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of reactor performance and microbial community in psychrophilic and mesophilic biogas digesters under solid state condition.
Wei S; Guo Y
J Biosci Bioeng; 2018 May; 125(5):543-551. PubMed ID: 29305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of the hydraulic retention time at constant high organic loading rate to reach the microbial limits of anaerobic digestion in various reactor systems.
Ziganshin AM; Schmidt T; Lv Z; Liebetrau J; Richnow HH; Kleinsteuber S; Nikolausz M
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Oct; 217():62-71. PubMed ID: 26853042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biogas production from coumarin-rich plants--inhibition by coumarin and recovery by adaptation of the bacterial community.
Popp D; Schrader S; Kleinsteuber S; Harms H; Sträuber H
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2015 Sep; 91(9):fiv103. PubMed ID: 26324856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anaerobic digestion of pig manure supernatant at high ammonia concentrations characterized by high abundances of Methanosaeta and non-euryarchaeotal archaea.
Nordgård ASR; Bergland WH; Vadstein O; Mironov V; Bakke R; Østgaard K; Bakke I
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15077. PubMed ID: 29118356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of operating strategies for increased biogas production from thin stillage.
Moestedt J; Nordell E; Schnürer A
J Biotechnol; 2014 Apr; 175():22-30. PubMed ID: 24524873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Key microbial communities steering the functioning of anaerobic digesters during hydraulic and organic overloading shocks.
Regueiro L; Lema JM; Carballa M
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Dec; 197():208-16. PubMed ID: 26340029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbial community structure and dynamics during anaerobic digestion of various agricultural waste materials.
Ziganshin AM; Liebetrau J; Pröter J; Kleinsteuber S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Jun; 97(11):5161-74. PubMed ID: 23624683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anaerobic digestion of biowaste under extreme ammonia concentration: Identification of key microbial phylotypes.
Poirier S; Desmond-Le Quéméner E; Madigou C; Bouchez T; Chapleur O
Bioresour Technol; 2016 May; 207():92-101. PubMed ID: 26874221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microbial population dynamics in response to increasing loadings of pre-hydrolyzed pig manure in an expanded granular sludge bed.
Wang H; Tao Y; Gao D; Liu G; Chen C; Ren N; van Lier JB; de Kreuk M
Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():29-37. PubMed ID: 26378729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Analysis of Methanogenic Communities in Different Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Digesters.
Ziganshin AM; Ziganshina EE; Kleinsteuber S; Nikolausz M
Archaea; 2016; 2016():3401272. PubMed ID: 28074084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
